GRLGF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
456.02M
PLMNF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
6.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRLGF vs PLMNF

Header iconGRLGF vs PLMNF Comparison
Open Charts GRLGF vs PLMNFBanner chart's image
Greatland Gold
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Volume$118.08K
Capitalization456.02M
Palamina
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.1K
Capitalization6.86M
GRLGF vs PLMNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLGF vs. PLMNF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLGF is a Hold and PLMNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLGF: $0.22 vs. PLMNF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: GRLGF and PLMNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLGF: 131% vs. PLMNF: 272%
Market capitalization -- GRLGF: $456.02M vs. PLMNF: $6.86M
GRLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $456.02M. PLMNF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLGF is a better buy in the long-term than PLMNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRLGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMNF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRLGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLMNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRLGF is a better buy in the short-term than PLMNF.

Price Growth

GRLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PLMNF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLGF($456M) has a higher market cap than PLMNF($6.86M). GRLGF YTD gains are higher at: 28.571 vs. PLMNF (5.630). PLMNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.62M vs. GRLGF (-20.54M). GRLGF has more cash in the bank: 59.8M vs. PLMNF (384K). GRLGF (0) and PLMNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRLGFPLMNFGRLGF / PLMNF
Capitalization456M6.86M6,649%
EBITDA-20.54M-1.62M1,264%
Gain YTD28.5715.630508%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash59.8M384K15,573%
Total Debt43.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLMNF: Fundamental Ratings
PLMNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRLGFPLMNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATRRF112.4716.22
+16.85%
Altarea Paris
WILLF41.750.55
+1.33%
Demant AS
ERRAF16.45N/A
N/A
Emera Inc.
OLKR0.14N/A
N/A
OpenLocker Holdings Inc.
CMRB4.86-0.03
-0.66%
First Commerce Bancorp Inc.

GRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLGF and BVN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLGF and BVN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLGF
1D Price
Change %
GRLGF100%
N/A
BVN - GRLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.00%
NIOVF - GRLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+39.66%
PLMNF - GRLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLGDF - GRLGF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - GRLGF
14%
Poorly correlated
-6.79%
More

PLMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLMNF and GRLGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLMNF and GRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMNF
1D Price
Change %
PLMNF100%
N/A
GRLGF - PLMNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDIV - PLMNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCCF - PLMNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNCKF - PLMNF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEXZF - PLMNF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
More