GRLGF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
NIOVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

GRLGF vs NIOVF

Header iconGRLGF vs NIOVF Comparison
Open Charts GRLGF vs NIOVFBanner chart's image
Greatland Gold
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
Plato Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
GRLGF vs NIOVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLGF vs. NIOVF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLGF is a Hold and NIOVF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GRLGF: $0.11 vs. NIOVF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: GRLGF and NIOVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLGF: 5% vs. NIOVF: 24%
Market capitalization -- GRLGF: $456.02M vs. NIOVF: $3.45M
GRLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $456.02M. NIOVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIOVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIOVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIOVF is a better buy in the long-term than GRLGF.

Price Growth

GRLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.82% price change this week, while NIOVF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLGF($456M) has a higher market cap than NIOVF($3.45M). NIOVF YTD gains are higher at: 108.257 vs. GRLGF (-0.901). NIOVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -224.89K vs. GRLGF (-20.54M). GRLGF has more cash in the bank: 59.8M vs. NIOVF (28.9K). NIOVF has less debt than GRLGF: NIOVF (34.1K) vs GRLGF (43.7M). GRLGF (0) and NIOVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRLGFNIOVFGRLGF / NIOVF
Capitalization456M3.45M13,233%
EBITDA-20.54M-224.89K9,132%
Gain YTD-0.901108.257-1%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash59.8M28.9K206,920%
Total Debt43.7M34.1K128,152%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIOVF: Fundamental Ratings
NIOVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
28

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

GRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLGF and BVN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLGF and BVN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLGF
1D Price
Change %
GRLGF100%
+10.00%
BVN - GRLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
NIOVF - GRLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMNF - GRLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CQRLF - GRLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMPEF - GRLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NIOVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIOVF and GRLGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIOVF and GRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIOVF
1D Price
Change %
NIOVF100%
N/A
GRLGF - NIOVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
AIRRF - NIOVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTRF - NIOVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMPEF - NIOVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSTMF - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+51.72%
More