GRLGF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
KLGDF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRLGF vs KLGDF

Header iconGRLGF vs KLGDF Comparison
Open Charts GRLGF vs KLGDFBanner chart's image
Greatland Gold
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Volume$118.08K
Capitalization2.77B
Kalo Gold
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization22.54M
GRLGF vs KLGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLGF vs. KLGDF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLGF is a StrongBuy and KLGDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLGF: $0.22 vs. KLGDF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: GRLGF and KLGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLGF: 100% vs. KLGDF: 41%
Market capitalization -- GRLGF: $2.77B vs. KLGDF: $22.54M
GRLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.77B. KLGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $22.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKLGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLGF is a better buy in the long-term than KLGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRLGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLGDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRLGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • KLGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GRLGF and KLGDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GRLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KLGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +16.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4955.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLGF($2.77B) has a higher market cap than KLGDF($22.5M). KLGDF YTD gains are higher at: 203.000 vs. GRLGF (28.571). KLGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.38M vs. GRLGF (-10.79M). GRLGF has more cash in the bank: 71.9M vs. KLGDF (3.08M). GRLGF has higher revenues than KLGDF: GRLGF (8.29M) vs KLGDF (0).
GRLGFKLGDFGRLGF / KLGDF
Capitalization2.77B22.5M12,293%
EBITDA-10.79M-2.38M453%
Gain YTD28.571203.00014%
P/E Ratio419.31N/A-
Revenue8.29M0-
Total Cash71.9M3.08M2,334%
Total Debt7.74MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRLGFKLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL238.478.75
+3.81%
Apple
TSLA334.094.73
+1.44%
Tesla
SPY643.743.47
+0.54%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X111723.210000522.625000
+0.47%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME22.88-0.53
-2.26%
GameStop Corp

GRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLGF and NIOVF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLGF and NIOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLGF
1D Price
Change %
GRLGF100%
N/A
NIOVF - GRLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMNF - GRLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
KLGDF - GRLGF
17%
Poorly correlated
+4.14%
IAUX - GRLGF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
ODV - GRLGF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
More

KLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLGDF and DRDGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLGDF and DRDGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLGDF
1D Price
Change %
KLGDF100%
+4.14%
DRDGF - KLGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNDXF - KLGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WKGFF - KLGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANKOF - KLGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
GRLGF - KLGDF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More