GRKZF
Price
$21.96
Change
-$0.20 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.5B
KMBIF
Price
$14.33
Change
+$1.31 (+10.06%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
575.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRKZF vs KMBIF

Header iconGRKZF vs KMBIF Comparison
Open Charts GRKZF vs KMBIFBanner chart's image
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
Price$21.96
Change-$0.20 (-0.90%)
Volume$347
Capitalization6.5B
Kambi Group
Price$14.33
Change+$1.31 (+10.06%)
Volume$200
Capitalization575.38M
GRKZF vs KMBIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRKZF vs. KMBIF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRKZF is a Hold and KMBIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GRKZF: $21.96 vs. KMBIF: $14.33)
Brand notoriety: GRKZF and KMBIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRKZF: 114% vs. KMBIF: 17%
Market capitalization -- GRKZF: $6.5B vs. KMBIF: $575.38M
GRKZF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $6.5B. KMBIF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $575.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRKZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKMBIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRKZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KMBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRKZF is a better buy in the long-term than KMBIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRKZF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMBIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRKZF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KMBIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMBIF is a better buy in the short-term than GRKZF.

Price Growth

GRKZF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KMBIF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +10.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRKZF($6.5B) has a higher market cap than KMBIF($575M). KMBIF has higher P/E ratio than GRKZF: KMBIF (23.87) vs GRKZF (16.56). KMBIF YTD gains are higher at: 49.582 vs. GRKZF (34.230). GRKZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 686M vs. KMBIF (62.6M). GRKZF has more cash in the bank: 600M vs. KMBIF (68.7M). KMBIF has less debt than GRKZF: KMBIF (20.4M) vs GRKZF (889M). GRKZF has higher revenues than KMBIF: GRKZF (1.3B) vs KMBIF (173M).
GRKZFKMBIFGRKZF / KMBIF
Capitalization6.5B575M1,130%
EBITDA686M62.6M1,096%
Gain YTD34.23049.58269%
P/E Ratio16.5623.8769%
Revenue1.3B173M753%
Total Cash600M68.7M873%
Total Debt889M20.4M4,358%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRKZF vs KMBIF: Fundamental Ratings
GRKZF
KMBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1098
SMR RATING
1..100
1775
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5914
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMBIF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRKZF (88). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

GRKZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMBIF (98). This means that GRKZF’s stock grew significantly faster than KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GRKZF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMBIF (75). This means that GRKZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMBIF’s over the last 12 months.

KMBIF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GRKZF (48). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew similarly to GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

KMBIF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRKZF (59). This means that KMBIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRKZFKMBIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTCAX65.750.98
+1.51%
MFS Technology A
NSCFX52.540.55
+1.06%
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps R6
HAIAX55.770.50
+0.90%
Hartford Core Equity A
HWVAX12.150.09
+0.75%
Hotchkis & Wiley Sm Cp Divers Val A
LEQIX13.09-0.02
-0.15%
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity I

GRKZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRKZF and GMVHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRKZF and GMVHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRKZF
1D Price
Change %
GRKZF100%
N/A
GMVHF - GRKZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
MCHVY - GRKZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - GRKZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - GRKZF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
KMBIF - GRKZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KMBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMBIF and PYTCF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMBIF and PYTCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMBIF
1D Price
Change %
KMBIF100%
N/A
PYTCF - KMBIF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRKZF - KMBIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFDJF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - KMBIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More