GRHI
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
10.24M
KYWAF
Price
$10.21
Change
-$0.05 (-0.49%)
Updated
Mar 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRHI vs KYWAF

Header iconGRHI vs KYWAF Comparison
Open Charts GRHI vs KYWAFBanner chart's image
Gold Rock Holdings
Price$0.04
Change+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization10.24M
Exeo Group
Price$10.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.49%)
Volume$620
Capitalization2.93B
GRHI vs KYWAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRHI vs. KYWAF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRHI is a Hold and KYWAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GRHI: $0.04 vs. KYWAF: $10.22)
Brand notoriety: GRHI and KYWAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRHI: 3% vs. KYWAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GRHI: $10.24M vs. KYWAF: $2.93B
GRHI [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $10.24M. KYWAF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $2.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRHI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKYWAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRHI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KYWAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRHI is a better buy in the long-term than KYWAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRHI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GRHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GRHI (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KYWAF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +494.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+2.08% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KYWAF($2.93B) has a higher market cap than GRHI($10.2M). GRHI has higher P/E ratio than KYWAF: GRHI (215.31) vs KYWAF (16.93). GRHI YTD gains are higher at: 104.762 vs. KYWAF (0.000). KYWAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 50.4B vs. GRHI (-45.87K). KYWAF has more cash in the bank: 38.7B vs. GRHI (210K). KYWAF has higher revenues than GRHI: KYWAF (622B) vs GRHI (270K).
GRHIKYWAFGRHI / KYWAF
Capitalization10.2M2.93B0%
EBITDA-45.87K50.4B-0%
Gain YTD104.7620.000-
P/E Ratio215.3116.931,272%
Revenue270K622B0%
Total Cash210K38.7B0%
Total DebtN/A93.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRHI vs KYWAF: Fundamental Ratings
GRHI
KYWAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3569
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3634
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KYWAF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRHI (100). This means that KYWAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRHI’s over the last 12 months.

GRHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KYWAF (100). This means that GRHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than KYWAF’s over the last 12 months.

GRHI's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as KYWAF (98). This means that GRHI’s stock grew similarly to KYWAF’s over the last 12 months.

GRHI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KYWAF (69). This means that GRHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than KYWAF’s over the last 12 months.

KYWAF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GRHI (36). This means that KYWAF’s stock grew similarly to GRHI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRGYX47.910.27
+0.57%
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Y
EIVIX14.530.07
+0.48%
Allspring Special Large Cap Value Inst
MSCFX29.010.10
+0.35%
Mairs & Power Small Cap
IMIDX22.40-0.29
-1.28%
Congress Mid Cap Growth Institutional
HROAX12.75-0.20
-1.54%
M3Sixty Income and Opportunity A

GRHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRHI and KYWAF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRHI and KYWAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRHI
1D Price
Change %
GRHI100%
N/A
KYWAF - GRHI
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFY - GRHI
14%
Poorly correlated
+6.54%
DNERF - GRHI
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWMN - GRHI
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
VATE - GRHI
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.19%
More

KYWAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KYWAF and BWMN have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KYWAF and BWMN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KYWAF
1D Price
Change %
KYWAF100%
N/A
BWMN - KYWAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
AGFY - KYWAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.54%
CSGQF - KYWAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGGF - KYWAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELWSF - KYWAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More