Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRGUX vs RMFCX
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GRGUX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R6
Price$49.84
Change+$0.36 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets413.56M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
GRGUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGUX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GRGUX (414M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GRGUX: RMFCX (1.27) vs GRGUX (1.12). GRGUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GRGUX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GRGUX (0.83). GRGUX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRGUX: RMFCX (250) vs GRGUX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. GRGUX (7.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. GRGUX (51.64).
| GRGUX | RMFCX | GRGUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.084 | 9.596 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 414M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.27 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 11.47 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.04 | 29.27 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.64 | 61.83 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement