GRGTF
Price
$2.93
Change
-$0.10 (-3.30%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.4B
SURDF
Price
$38.64
Change
+$0.08 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRGTF vs SURDF

Header iconGRGTF vs SURDF Comparison
Open Charts GRGTF vs SURDFBanner chart's image
Grainger
Price$2.93
Change-$0.10 (-3.30%)
Volume$160
Capitalization2.4B
Sumitomo Realty & Development
Price$38.64
Change+$0.08 (+0.21%)
Volume$252
Capitalization12.81B
GRGTF vs SURDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRGTF vs. SURDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGTF is a Hold and SURDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GRGTF: $2.93 vs. SURDF: $38.64)
Brand notoriety: GRGTF and SURDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRGTF: 24% vs. SURDF: 57%
Market capitalization -- GRGTF: $2.4B vs. SURDF: $12.81B
GRGTF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.4B. SURDF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $12.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRGTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSURDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRGTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SURDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SURDF is a better buy in the long-term than GRGTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRGTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SURDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRGTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SURDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GRGTF and SURDF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GRGTF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -4.72% price change this week, while SURDF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SURDF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than GRGTF($2.4B). GRGTF (10.95) and SURDF (10.91) have similar P/E ratio . SURDF YTD gains are higher at: 22.309 vs. GRGTF (0.000). SURDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 247B vs. GRGTF (237M). SURDF has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. GRGTF (70.5M). GRGTF has less debt than SURDF: GRGTF (1.48B) vs SURDF (3.68T). SURDF has higher revenues than GRGTF: SURDF (925B) vs GRGTF (262M).
GRGTFSURDFGRGTF / SURDF
Capitalization2.4B12.8B19%
EBITDA237M247B0%
Gain YTD0.00022.309-
P/E Ratio10.9510.91100%
Revenue262M925B0%
Total Cash70.5M161B0%
Total Debt1.48B3.68T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SURDF: Fundamental Ratings
SURDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRGTFSURDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASTH25.280.63
+2.56%
Astrana Health
IBEX30.630.69
+2.30%
IBEX Limited
KLC9.950.08
+0.81%
KinderCare Learning Companies Inc
JEF56.940.32
+0.57%
Jefferies Financial Group
LINK7.00-0.64
-8.38%
Interlink Electronics

GRGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGTF and SURDF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGTF and SURDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGTF
1D Price
Change %
GRGTF100%
-3.43%
SURDF - GRGTF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRE - GRGTF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
ACNDF - GRGTF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
VNNVF - GRGTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWPFF - GRGTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SURDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SURDF has been loosely correlated with SRRLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SURDF jumps, then SRRLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SURDF
1D Price
Change %
SURDF100%
N/A
SRRLF - SURDF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTOUF - SURDF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRGTF - SURDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
MITEF - SURDF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRUNF - SURDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
More