GRGTF
Price
$2.45
Change
-$0.04 (-1.61%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
SRRLF
Price
$1.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRGTF vs SRRLF

Header iconGRGTF vs SRRLF Comparison
Open Charts GRGTF vs SRRLFBanner chart's image
Grainger
Price$2.45
Change-$0.04 (-1.61%)
Volume$15.9K
Capitalization1.81B
SIRIUS REAL ESTATE
Price$1.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.76K
Capitalization1.93B
GRGTF vs SRRLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRGTF vs. SRRLF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGTF is a Hold and SRRLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GRGTF: $2.45 vs. SRRLF: $1.32)
Brand notoriety: GRGTF and SRRLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRGTF: 560% vs. SRRLF: 82%
Market capitalization -- GRGTF: $1.81B vs. SRRLF: $1.93B
GRGTF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.81B. SRRLF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRGTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRRLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRGTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRRLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRRLF is a better buy in the long-term than GRGTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRGTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRRLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRGTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SRRLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRRLF is a better buy in the short-term than GRGTF.

Price Growth

GRGTF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRRLF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.47% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRRLF($1.93B) has a higher market cap than GRGTF($1.81B). GRGTF has higher P/E ratio than SRRLF: GRGTF (12.39) vs SRRLF (9.35). SRRLF YTD gains are higher at: 12.340 vs. GRGTF (-16.382). SRRLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 235M vs. GRGTF (189M). SRRLF has more cash in the bank: 571M vs. GRGTF (74.9M). SRRLF has less debt than GRGTF: SRRLF (1.36B) vs GRGTF (1.57B). SRRLF (318M) and GRGTF (306M) have equivalent revenues.
GRGTFSRRLFGRGTF / SRRLF
Capitalization1.81B1.93B94%
EBITDA189M235M80%
Gain YTD-16.38212.340-133%
P/E Ratio12.399.35132%
Revenue306M318M96%
Total Cash74.9M571M13%
Total Debt1.57B1.36B116%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRGTFSRRLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
33%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPEGX21.390.15
+0.71%
Alger Responsible Investing A
FAMDX24.840.16
+0.65%
FAM Small Cap Institutional
TSRLX81.010.38
+0.47%
Touchstone Large Cap Focused R6
CSHCX8.780.04
+0.46%
NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Class C
BSPAX773.95N/A
N/A
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor A

GRGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGTF and SURDF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGTF and SURDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGTF
1D Price
Change %
GRGTF100%
N/A
SURDF - GRGTF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACNDF - GRGTF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
VNNVF - GRGTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.02%
SWPFF - GRGTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
SRRLF - GRGTF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SRRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRRLF has been loosely correlated with SURDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRRLF jumps, then SURDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRRLF
1D Price
Change %
SRRLF100%
N/A
SURDF - SRRLF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLLNY - SRRLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
GRGTF - SRRLF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WETH - SRRLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OJOC - SRRLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More