GRCLF
Price
$5.03
Change
-$0.09 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.2B
HERB
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
34.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCLF vs HERB

Header iconGRCLF vs HERB Comparison
Open Charts GRCLF vs HERBBanner chart's image
Grain
Price$5.03
Change-$0.09 (-1.76%)
Volume$3.16K
Capitalization1.2B
YaSheng Group
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization34.33M
GRCLF vs HERB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HERB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCLF vs. HERB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCLF is a Hold and HERB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCLF: $5.03 vs. HERB: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: GRCLF and HERB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCLF: 14% vs. HERB: 2%
Market capitalization -- GRCLF: $1.2B vs. HERB: $34.33M
GRCLF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $1.2B. HERB’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $34.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHERB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HERB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRCLF is a better buy in the long-term than HERB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HERB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HERB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HERB is a better buy in the short-term than GRCLF.

Price Growth

GRCLF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while HERB (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -22.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (-0.02% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRCLF($1.2B) has a higher market cap than HERB($34.3M). GRCLF has higher P/E ratio than HERB: GRCLF (5.43) vs HERB (0.08). GRCLF YTD gains are higher at: 15.187 vs. HERB (-64.773). GRCLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 666M vs. HERB (127M). GRCLF has more cash in the bank: 322M vs. HERB (1.4M). HERB has less debt than GRCLF: HERB (45.7M) vs GRCLF (1.1B). GRCLF has higher revenues than HERB: GRCLF (8.55B) vs HERB (939M).
GRCLFHERBGRCLF / HERB
Capitalization1.2B34.3M3,510%
EBITDA666M127M524%
Gain YTD15.187-64.773-23%
P/E Ratio5.430.086,482%
Revenue8.55B939M911%
Total Cash322M1.4M23,049%
Total Debt1.1B45.7M2,416%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCLF vs HERB: Fundamental Ratings
GRCLF
HERB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
9265
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5090
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRCLF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HERB (62). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HERB (100). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HERB’s over the last 12 months.

HERB's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCLF (92). This means that HERB’s stock grew similarly to GRCLF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HERB (90). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HERB (100). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than HERB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCLFHERB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HERB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWLLY16.160.53
+3.37%
Great Wall Motor Company, Ltd.
TWODY15.770.11
+0.70%
Taylor Wimpey Plc
ELVUF0.21N/A
N/A
Elevate Uranium Ltd.
YONXF17.00N/A
N/A
Yonex Company Ltd.
MGWFF0.02N/A
N/A
Maple Leaf Green World, Inc.

GRCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRCLF and GARPF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRCLF and GARPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCLF
1D Price
Change %
GRCLF100%
-1.76%
GARPF - GRCLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-16.92%
GSFD - GRCLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGSF - GRCLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPY - GRCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
CTUNF - GRCLF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HERB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HERB and GSFD have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HERB and GSFD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HERB
1D Price
Change %
HERB100%
-11.43%
GSFD - HERB
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - HERB
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGSF - HERB
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPF - HERB
-7%
Poorly correlated
-16.92%
GRCLF - HERB
-8%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
More