GRCLF
Price
$5.03
Change
-$0.09 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.2B
GRGSF
Price
$6.90
Change
+$0.90 (+15.00%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
803.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCLF vs GRGSF

Header iconGRCLF vs GRGSF Comparison
Open Charts GRCLF vs GRGSFBanner chart's image
Grain
Price$5.03
Change-$0.09 (-1.76%)
Volume$3.16K
Capitalization1.2B
Grieg Seafood ASA
Price$6.90
Change+$0.90 (+15.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization803.23M
GRCLF vs GRGSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCLF vs. GRGSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCLF is a Hold and GRGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCLF: $5.03 vs. GRGSF: $6.90)
Brand notoriety: GRCLF and GRGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCLF: 14% vs. GRGSF: 70%
Market capitalization -- GRCLF: $1.2B vs. GRGSF: $803.23M
GRCLF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $1.2B. GRGSF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $803.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGRGSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GRGSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRCLF is a better buy in the long-term than GRGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRGSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GRGSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRGSF is a better buy in the short-term than GRCLF.

Price Growth

GRCLF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while GRGSF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.10% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRCLF($1.2B) has a higher market cap than GRGSF($803M). GRGSF has higher P/E ratio than GRCLF: GRGSF (8.49) vs GRCLF (5.43). GRCLF YTD gains are higher at: 15.187 vs. GRGSF (9.873). GRGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.78B vs. GRCLF (666M). GRGSF has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. GRCLF (322M). GRCLF has less debt than GRGSF: GRCLF (1.1B) vs GRGSF (3.79B). GRCLF has higher revenues than GRGSF: GRCLF (8.55B) vs GRGSF (7.25B).
GRCLFGRGSFGRCLF / GRGSF
Capitalization1.2B803M150%
EBITDA666M1.78B37%
Gain YTD15.1879.873154%
P/E Ratio5.438.4964%
Revenue8.55B7.25B118%
Total Cash322M1.27B25%
Total Debt1.1B3.79B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCLF vs GRGSF: Fundamental Ratings
GRCLF
GRGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRCLF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (41). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRGSF (100). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (97). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (51). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCLF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRGSF (100). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCLFGRGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIIGX82.180.70
+0.86%
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders R6
ILVBX10.430.08
+0.77%
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Val A
SINOX39.020.26
+0.67%
ClearBridge Large Cap Value C
IEVAX13.370.08
+0.60%
Columbia Global Value A
SGOIX29.700.04
+0.13%
First Eagle Overseas I

GRCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRCLF and GARPF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRCLF and GARPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCLF
1D Price
Change %
GRCLF100%
-1.76%
GARPF - GRCLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-16.92%
GSFD - GRCLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGSF - GRCLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPY - GRCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
CTUNF - GRCLF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGSF and GRCLF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGSF and GRCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGSF
1D Price
Change %
GRGSF100%
N/A
GRCLF - GRGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
EDESY - GRGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - GRGSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - GRGSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-11.43%
GARPY - GRGSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
More