Advertisement
GRCLF vs GRGSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCLF is a Hold and GRGSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GRCLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGRGSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GRCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GRGSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GRCLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRGSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GRCLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GRGSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
GRCLF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while GRGSF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.61%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.10% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| GRCLF | GRGSF | GRCLF / GRGSF | |
| Capitalization | 1.2B | 803M | 150% |
| EBITDA | 666M | 1.78B | 37% |
| Gain YTD | 15.187 | 9.873 | 154% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.43 | 8.49 | 64% |
| Revenue | 8.55B | 7.25B | 118% |
| Total Cash | 322M | 1.27B | 25% |
| Total Debt | 1.1B | 3.79B | 29% |
GRCLF | GRGSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GRCLF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (41). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.
GRCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRGSF (100). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.
GRCLF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (97). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.
GRCLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (51). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.
GRCLF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRGSF (100). This means that GRCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.
| GRCLF | GRGSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 28% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 28% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 21% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 25% |
Advertisement
GRCLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRCLF and GARPF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRCLF and GARPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRCLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRCLF | 100% | -1.76% | ||
| GARPF - GRCLF | 5% Poorly correlated | -16.92% | ||
| GSFD - GRCLF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRGSF - GRCLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GARPY - GRCLF | -2% Poorly correlated | +6.43% | ||
| CTUNF - GRCLF | -4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GRGSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGSF and GRCLF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGSF and GRCLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRGSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRGSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GRCLF - GRGSF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| EDESY - GRGSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CTUNF - GRGSF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HERB - GRGSF | -0% Poorly correlated | -11.43% | ||
| GARPY - GRGSF | -0% Poorly correlated | +6.43% | ||
More | ||||