GRCAF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
17.76M
SWLFF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCAF vs SWLFF

Header iconGRCAF vs SWLFF Comparison
Open Charts GRCAF vs SWLFFBanner chart's image
GOLD SPRINGS RESOURCE
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization17.76M
Silver Wolf Exploration
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$15.45K
Capitalization2.16M
GRCAF vs SWLFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCAF vs. SWLFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCAF is a Hold and SWLFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCAF: $0.06 vs. SWLFF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: GRCAF and SWLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCAF: 24% vs. SWLFF: 41%
Market capitalization -- GRCAF: $17.76M vs. SWLFF: $2.16M
GRCAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $17.76M. SWLFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWLFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GRCAF and SWLFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWLFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWLFF is a better buy in the short-term than GRCAF.

Price Growth

GRCAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.67% price change this week, while SWLFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRCAF($17.8M) has a higher market cap than SWLFF($2.16M). GRCAF YTD gains are higher at: 4.815 vs. SWLFF (-0.475). SWLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -559.93K vs. GRCAF (-1.07M). GRCAF has more cash in the bank: 538K vs. SWLFF (163K). SWLFF has less debt than GRCAF: SWLFF (17.9K) vs GRCAF (29.6K). GRCAF (0) and SWLFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRCAFSWLFFGRCAF / SWLFF
Capitalization17.8M2.16M825%
EBITDA-1.07M-559.93K190%
Gain YTD4.815-0.475-1,014%
P/E Ratio18.59N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash538K163K330%
Total Debt29.6K17.9K165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCAF vs SWLFF: Fundamental Ratings
GRCAF
SWLFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9495
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6077
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRCAF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SWLFF (65). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to SWLFF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SWLFF (95). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to SWLFF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCAF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SWLFF (94). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to SWLFF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCAF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SWLFF (77). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to SWLFF’s over the last 12 months.

SWLFF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRCAF (95). This means that SWLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCAFSWLFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSF6.480.17
+2.69%
Laird Superfood
XYZ66.631.52
+2.33%
Block Inc
AVT52.66-0.03
-0.06%
Avnet
NCDL16.40-0.19
-1.15%
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp
YMAB4.70-0.10
-2.08%
Y-mAbs Therapeutics

GRCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRCAF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRCAF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCAF
1D Price
Change %
GRCAF100%
+8.85%
GMINF - GRCAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.03%
ENDMF - GRCAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCHDF - GRCAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
SWLFF - GRCAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-9.83%
GSRCF - GRCAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWLFF and CALRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWLFF and CALRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWLFF
1D Price
Change %
SWLFF100%
-9.83%
CALRF - SWLFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSVRF - SWLFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.68%
WTHVF - SWLFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
HCHDF - SWLFF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
GOTRF - SWLFF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More