GRCAF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.31M
HELOF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.03 (-27.27%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCAF vs HELOF

Header iconGRCAF vs HELOF Comparison
Open Charts GRCAF vs HELOFBanner chart's image
GOLD SPRINGS RESOURCE
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$26.1K
Capitalization17.31M
WINSHEAR GOLD
Price$0.07
Change-$0.03 (-27.27%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization3.18M
GRCAF vs HELOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HELOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCAF vs. HELOF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCAF is a Hold and HELOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCAF: $0.06 vs. HELOF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: GRCAF and HELOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCAF: 62% vs. HELOF: 39%
Market capitalization -- GRCAF: $17.31M vs. HELOF: $3.18M
GRCAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $17.31M. HELOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHELOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HELOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HELOF is a better buy in the long-term than GRCAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HELOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HELOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HELOF is a better buy in the short-term than GRCAF.

Price Growth

GRCAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.49% price change this week, while HELOF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRCAF($17.3M) has a higher market cap than HELOF($3.18M). GRCAF YTD gains are higher at: 15.556 vs. HELOF (-16.667). GRCAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -523.77K vs. HELOF (-2.14M). HELOF has more cash in the bank: 1.67M vs. GRCAF (22.2K). GRCAF (0) and HELOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRCAFHELOFGRCAF / HELOF
Capitalization17.3M3.18M543%
EBITDA-523.77K-2.14M24%
Gain YTD15.556-16.667-93%
P/E RatioN/A0.11-
Revenue00-
Total Cash22.2K1.67M1%
Total Debt29.3KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCAF vs HELOF: Fundamental Ratings
GRCAF
HELOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7839
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9454
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
29n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HELOF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCAF (66). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCAF (100). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCAF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as HELOF (98). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to HELOF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCAF (57). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRCAF (94). This means that HELOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCAFHELOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HELOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XEL79.282.03
+2.63%
Xcel Energy
TOYO6.030.10
+1.69%
Toyo Co Ltd
IBOC70.110.83
+1.20%
International Bancshares Corp
ODC62.27-0.46
-0.73%
Oil-Dri Corporation Of America
YYGH0.37-0.01
-1.49%
YY Group Holding Limited

GRCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRCAF and HCHDF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRCAF and HCHDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCAF
1D Price
Change %
GRCAF100%
N/A
HCHDF - GRCAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
HELOF - GRCAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTRF - GRCAF
-10%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%

HELOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HELOF and IMRFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HELOF and IMRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HELOF
1D Price
Change %
HELOF100%
N/A
IMRFF - HELOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUPGF - HELOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.66%
GPTRF - HELOF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
HCHDF - HELOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
GRCAF - HELOF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A