GRCAF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
20.61M
HELOF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.03 (-27.27%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRCAF vs HELOF

Header iconGRCAF vs HELOF Comparison
Open Charts GRCAF vs HELOFBanner chart's image
GOLD SPRINGS RESOURCE
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23.58K
Capitalization20.61M
WINSHEAR GOLD
Price$0.07
Change-$0.03 (-27.27%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization3.85M
GRCAF vs HELOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HELOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRCAF vs. HELOF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRCAF is a Hold and HELOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GRCAF: $0.08 vs. HELOF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: GRCAF and HELOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRCAF: 119% vs. HELOF: 21%
Market capitalization -- GRCAF: $20.61M vs. HELOF: $3.85M
GRCAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $20.61M. HELOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRCAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHELOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HELOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HELOF is a better buy in the long-term than GRCAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRCAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HELOF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRCAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HELOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRCAF is a better buy in the short-term than HELOF.

Price Growth

GRCAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.50% price change this week, while HELOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +25.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.60% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRCAF($20.6M) has a higher market cap than HELOF($3.85M). GRCAF YTD gains are higher at: 51.296 vs. HELOF (-16.667). GRCAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -571.81K vs. HELOF (-2.14M). HELOF has more cash in the bank: 1.67M vs. GRCAF (16.9K). GRCAF (0) and HELOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRCAFHELOFGRCAF / HELOF
Capitalization20.6M3.85M535%
EBITDA-571.81K-2.14M27%
Gain YTD51.296-16.667-308%
P/E RatioN/A0.11-
Revenue00-
Total Cash16.9K1.67M1%
Total Debt27.8KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRCAF vs HELOF: Fundamental Ratings
GRCAF
HELOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9460
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HELOF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCAF (67). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRCAF (100). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCAF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as HELOF (98). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to HELOF’s over the last 12 months.

GRCAF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HELOF (37). This means that GRCAF’s stock grew similarly to HELOF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRCAF (94). This means that HELOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRCAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRCAFHELOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HELOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARAFF0.140.01
+7.62%
Arafura Resources NL
JELCF2.70N/A
N/A
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
EGFEF3.86N/A
N/A
EUROBANK ERGASIAS SVCS AND HOLDINGS SA
ISCO0.13N/A
N/A
International Stem Cell Corp.
HCKG24.00N/A
N/A
Hocking Valley Bancshares, Inc. (OH)

GRCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRCAF and HCHDF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRCAF and HCHDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRCAF
1D Price
Change %
GRCAF100%
-2.27%
HCHDF - GRCAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
HELOF - GRCAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTRF - GRCAF
-10%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%

HELOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HELOF and IMRFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HELOF and IMRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HELOF
1D Price
Change %
HELOF100%
N/A
IMRFF - HELOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUPGF - HELOF
20%
Poorly correlated
-10.39%
GPTRF - HELOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
HCHDF - HELOF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
GRCAF - HELOF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%