GRAM
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.27M
PHJMF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Updated
Apr 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.94B
Ad is loading...

GRAM vs PHJMF

Header iconGRAM vs PHJMF Comparison
Open Charts GRAM vs PHJMFBanner chart's image
GOLD FLORA
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$78.26K
Capitalization9.27M
PT Hanjaya Mandala Sampoerna Terbuka
Price$0.05
Change+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Volume$14.9K
Capitalization3.94B
GRAM vs PHJMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GRAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRAM vs. PHJMF commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRAM is a Hold and PHJMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (GRAM: $0.04 vs. PHJMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: GRAM and PHJMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Tobacco industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRAM: 105% vs. PHJMF: 15%
Market capitalization -- GRAM: $9.27M vs. PHJMF: $3.94B
GRAM [@Tobacco] is valued at $9.27M. PHJMF’s [@Tobacco] market capitalization is $3.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $254.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $27.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHJMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GRAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHJMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHJMF is a better buy in the long-term than GRAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRAM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GRAM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

GRAM (@Tobacco) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PHJMF (@Tobacco) price change was +100.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +10.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tobacco (+10.77% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHJMF($3.94B) has a higher market cap than GRAM($9.27M). GRAM YTD gains are higher at: 52.000 vs. PHJMF (26.072). PHJMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.16T vs. GRAM (-59.6M). PHJMF has more cash in the bank: 6.03T vs. GRAM (10.2M). GRAM has less debt than PHJMF: GRAM (164M) vs PHJMF (391B). PHJMF has higher revenues than GRAM: PHJMF (117.16T) vs GRAM (125M).
GRAMPHJMFGRAM / PHJMF
Capitalization9.27M3.94B0%
EBITDA-59.6M9.16T-0%
Gain YTD52.00026.072199%
P/E RatioN/A14.76-
Revenue125M117.16T0%
Total Cash10.2M6.03T0%
Total Debt164M391B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRAM vs PHJMF: Fundamental Ratings
GRAM
PHJMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PHJMF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRAM (75). This means that PHJMF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

PHJMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRAM (100). This means that PHJMF’s stock grew similarly to GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

PHJMF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRAM (100). This means that PHJMF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

PHJMF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GRAM (61). This means that PHJMF’s stock grew similarly to GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

PHJMF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRAM (100). This means that PHJMF’s stock grew significantly faster than GRAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GRAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla
BTC.X84450.805000-444.945300
-0.52%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

GRAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRAM and VPRB have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRAM and VPRB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAM
1D Price
Change %
GRAM100%
N/A
VPRB - GRAM
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
GDNGY - GRAM
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPAF - GRAM
7%
Poorly correlated
+5.89%
JAPAY - GRAM
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
IMBBY - GRAM
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
More

PHJMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PHJMF and GDNGY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PHJMF and GDNGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHJMF
1D Price
Change %
PHJMF100%
N/A
GDNGY - PHJMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMBBF - PHJMF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
JAPAF - PHJMF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+5.89%
IMBBY - PHJMF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
GRAM - PHJMF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More