GRAF
Price
$10.47
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
305.34M
TRTLF
Price
$11.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 6 closing price
Capitalization
279.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRAF vs TRTLF

Header iconGRAF vs TRTLF Comparison
Open Charts GRAF vs TRTLFBanner chart's image
Graf Global
Price$10.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$39.59K
Capitalization305.34M
TortoiseEcofin Acquisition Corp. III
Price$11.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization279.09M
GRAF vs TRTLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRAF vs. TRTLF commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRAF is a Hold and TRTLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (GRAF: $10.47 vs. TRTLF: $11.06)
Brand notoriety: GRAF and TRTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRAF: 395% vs. TRTLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GRAF: $305.34M vs. TRTLF: $279.09M
GRAF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $305.34M. TRTLF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $279.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRTLF is a better buy in the long-term than GRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GRAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

GRAF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while TRTLF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+2.93% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRAF($305M) has a higher market cap than TRTLF($279M). GRAF has higher P/E ratio than TRTLF: GRAF (115.54) vs TRTLF (37.17). GRAF YTD gains are higher at: 3.766 vs. TRTLF (0.000). GRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.18M vs. TRTLF (-2.73M). GRAF has more cash in the bank: 383K vs. TRTLF (13.1K). GRAF has less debt than TRTLF: GRAF (0) vs TRTLF (715K). GRAF (0) and TRTLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRAFTRTLFGRAF / TRTLF
Capitalization305M279M109%
EBITDA-1.18M-2.73M43%
Gain YTD3.7660.000-
P/E Ratio115.5437.17311%
Revenue00-
Total Cash383K13.1K2,924%
Total Debt0715K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TRTLF: Fundamental Ratings
TRTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRAFTRTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA329.6510.24
+3.21%
Tesla
AAPL211.181.16
+0.55%
Apple
SPY627.58-0.46
-0.07%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
GME23.28-0.12
-0.51%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X117300.790000-639.187500
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

GRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRAF and OAKUU have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRAF and OAKUU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAF
1D Price
Change %
GRAF100%
N/A
OAKUU - GRAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRTLF - GRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCGU - GRAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVACU - GRAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPOD - GRAF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More

TRTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRTLF and AACI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRTLF and AACI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRTLF
1D Price
Change %
TRTLF100%
N/A
AACI - TRTLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - TRTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORTU - TRTLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTAF - TRTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TREE - TRTLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More