GPUS
Price
$0.43
Change
+$0.01 (+2.38%)
Updated
Sep 5, 02:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.38M
PL
Price
$6.52
Change
+$0.06 (+0.93%)
Updated
Sep 5, 02:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.96B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPUS vs PL

Header iconGPUS vs PL Comparison
Open Charts GPUS vs PLBanner chart's image
Hyperscale Data
Price$0.43
Change+$0.01 (+2.38%)
Volume$10.27K
Capitalization11.38M
Planet Labs PBC
Price$6.52
Change+$0.06 (+0.93%)
Volume$40.97K
Capitalization1.96B
GPUS vs PL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPUS vs. PL commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPUS is a Buy and PL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GPUS: $0.42 vs. PL: $6.46)
Brand notoriety: GPUS and PL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPUS: 22% vs. PL: 94%
Market capitalization -- GPUS: $11.38M vs. PL: $1.96B
GPUS [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $11.38M. PL’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $1.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $299.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $22.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPUS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PL is a better buy in the long-term than GPUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPUS is a better buy in the short-term than PL.

Price Growth

GPUS (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -24.70% price change this week, while PL (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -10.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

PL is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+1.65% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PL($1.96B) has a higher market cap than GPUS($11.4M). PL YTD gains are higher at: 59.901 vs. GPUS (-91.374). GPUS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -39.16M vs. PL (-60.71M). PL has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. GPUS (24.1M). PL has less debt than GPUS: PL (19.6M) vs GPUS (120M). PL has higher revenues than GPUS: PL (250M) vs GPUS (93.3M).
GPUSPLGPUS / PL
Capitalization11.4M1.96B1%
EBITDA-39.16M-60.71M65%
Gain YTD-91.37459.901-153%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue93.3M250M37%
Total Cash24.1M226M11%
Total Debt120M19.6M612%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPUS: Fundamental Ratings
GPUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPUSPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIVN58.151.56
+2.76%
LivaNova PLC
FNWD32.350.84
+2.68%
Finward Bancorp
ULTA529.50-1.57
-0.30%
Ulta Beauty
SABR1.72-0.01
-0.58%
Sabre Corp
DSS1.21-0.15
-11.03%
DSS

GPUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPUS and RDW have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPUS and RDW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPUS
1D Price
Change %
GPUS100%
-2.24%
RDW - GPUS
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
PKE - GPUS
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
DPRO - GPUS
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
DRS - GPUS
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
PL - GPUS
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More

PL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PL has been loosely correlated with RDW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PL jumps, then RDW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PL
1D Price
Change %
PL100%
+0.31%
RDW - PL
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
RKLB - PL
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
HXL - PL
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
LUNR - PL
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
CW - PL
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
More