GPTGF
Price
$2.98
Change
+$0.10 (+3.47%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.54B
NTSGF
Price
$1.60
Change
+$0.09 (+5.96%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPTGF vs NTSGF

Header iconGPTGF vs NTSGF Comparison
Open Charts GPTGF vs NTSGFBanner chart's image
GPT Group
Price$2.98
Change+$0.10 (+3.47%)
Volume$453
Capitalization5.54B
NATIONAL STORAGE REIT
Price$1.60
Change+$0.09 (+5.96%)
Volume$1.96K
Capitalization6.14B
GPTGF vs NTSGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPTGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPTGF vs. NTSGF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPTGF is a Hold and NTSGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GPTGF: $2.98 vs. NTSGF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: GPTGF and NTSGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPTGF: 121% vs. NTSGF: 81%
Market capitalization -- GPTGF: $5.54B vs. NTSGF: $6.14B
GPTGF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $5.54B. NTSGF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $6.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPTGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTSGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPTGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTSGF is a better buy in the long-term than GPTGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPTGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTSGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPTGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NTSGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTSGF is a better buy in the short-term than GPTGF.

Price Growth

GPTGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NTSGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTSGF($6.14B) has a higher market cap than GPTGF($5.54B). GPTGF has higher P/E ratio than NTSGF: GPTGF (17.27) vs NTSGF (3.43). NTSGF YTD gains are higher at: 10.345 vs. GPTGF (3.979). GPTGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 621M vs. NTSGF (579M). NTSGF has more cash in the bank: 83.7M vs. GPTGF (60.2M). NTSGF has less debt than GPTGF: NTSGF (1.08B) vs GPTGF (5.1B). GPTGF has higher revenues than NTSGF: GPTGF (802M) vs NTSGF (299M).
GPTGFNTSGFGPTGF / NTSGF
Capitalization5.54B6.14B90%
EBITDA621M579M107%
Gain YTD3.97910.34538%
P/E Ratio17.273.43503%
Revenue802M299M268%
Total Cash60.2M83.7M72%
Total Debt5.1B1.08B472%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPTGF: Fundamental Ratings
GPTGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPTGFNTSGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPTGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HTUS40.210.24
+0.59%
Hull Tactical US ETF
NNOV27.450.13
+0.49%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Nov
XIDE30.220.03
+0.10%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & PrmIncETF-Dec
GXC87.12-0.13
-0.15%
SPDR® S&P China ETF
SQQQ19.13-0.53
-2.70%
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

GPTGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPTGF and NTSGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPTGF and NTSGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPTGF
1D Price
Change %
GPTGF100%
N/A
NTSGF - GPTGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GECFF - GPTGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IIPZF - GPTGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVREF - GPTGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLPEF - GPTGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NTSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTSGF has been loosely correlated with PRKWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTSGF jumps, then PRKWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTSGF
1D Price
Change %
NTSGF100%
N/A
PRKWF - NTSGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRZCF - NTSGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRWRF - NTSGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - NTSGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTGF - NTSGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More