GPRO
Price
$1.16
Change
-$1.19 (-50.64%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
186.08M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XIACF
Price
$4.35
Change
-$2.45 (-36.03%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
114.94B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPRO vs XIACF

Header iconGPRO vs XIACF Comparison
Open Charts GPRO vs XIACFBanner chart's image
GoPro
Price$1.16
Change-$1.19 (-50.64%)
Volume$4.73M
Capitalization186.08M
Xiaomi
Price$4.35
Change-$2.45 (-36.03%)
Volume$56.06K
Capitalization114.94B
GPRO vs XIACF Comparison Chart in %
GPRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XIACF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPRO vs. XIACF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPRO is a Hold and XIACF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (GPRO: $1.16 vs. XIACF: $4.35)
Brand notoriety: GPRO: Notable vs. XIACF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Peripherals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPRO: 172% vs. XIACF: 69%
Market capitalization -- GPRO: $186.08M vs. XIACF: $114.94B
GPRO [@Computer Peripherals] is valued at $186.08M. XIACF’s [@Computer Peripherals] market capitalization is $114.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Peripherals] industry ranges from $3.96T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Peripherals] industry is $116.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPRO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXIACF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XIACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPRO is a better buy in the long-term than XIACF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPRO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XIACF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPRO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • XIACF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPRO is a better buy in the short-term than XIACF.

Price Growth

GPRO (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -10.08% price change this week, while XIACF (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -5.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

GPRO is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Peripherals (-0.70% weekly)

Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XIACF($115B) has a higher market cap than GPRO($186M). XIACF YTD gains are higher at: -14.201 vs. GPRO (-17.730).
GPROXIACFGPRO / XIACF
Capitalization186M115B0%
EBITDA-107.24MN/A-
Gain YTD-17.730-14.201125%
P/E RatioN/A20.98-
Revenue651MN/A-
Total Cash58.4MN/A-
Total Debt205MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPRO vs XIACF: Fundamental Ratings
GPRO
XIACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
642
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9984
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6583
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
298
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPRO's Valuation (56) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as XIACF (62) in the null industry. This means that GPRO’s stock grew similarly to XIACF’s over the last 12 months.

GPRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as XIACF (100) in the null industry. This means that GPRO’s stock grew similarly to XIACF’s over the last 12 months.

XIACF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as GPRO (99) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that XIACF’s stock grew similarly to GPRO’s over the last 12 months.

GPRO's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as XIACF (83) in the null industry. This means that GPRO’s stock grew similarly to XIACF’s over the last 12 months.

GPRO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is significantly better than the same rating for XIACF (98) in the null industry. This means that GPRO’s stock grew significantly faster than XIACF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPROXIACF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XIACF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRID7.64N/A
N/A
Bridgford Foods Corp
NHICU10.75N/A
N/A
NewHold Investment Corp III
PAYO5.93-0.17
-2.79%
Payoneer Global
NAGE5.68-0.42
-6.81%
Niagen Bioscience Inc
IT160.16-42.24
-20.87%
Gartner

GPRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPRO has been loosely correlated with SONO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPRO jumps, then SONO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPRO
1D Price
Change %
GPRO100%
+6.42%
SONO - GPRO
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
KOSS - GPRO
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.25%
TBCH - GPRO
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
SONY - GPRO
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
AAPL - GPRO
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

XIACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XIACF has been closely correlated with XIACY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XIACF jumps, then XIACY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XIACF
1D Price
Change %
XIACF100%
-3.33%
XIACY - XIACF
87%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
LPL - XIACF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPRO - XIACF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.42%
ZEPP - XIACF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
UEIC - XIACF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More