GPPRF
Price
$0.38
Change
+$0.03 (+8.57%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
194.93M
SLVDF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPPRF vs SLVDF

Header iconGPPRF vs SLVDF Comparison
Open Charts GPPRF vs SLVDFBanner chart's image
Cerro De Pasco Res
Price$0.38
Change+$0.03 (+8.57%)
Volume$266.22K
Capitalization194.93M
Silver Dollar Resources
Price$0.26
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$10.43K
Capitalization14.79M
GPPRF vs SLVDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPPRF vs. SLVDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPPRF is a Hold and SLVDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GPPRF: $0.38 vs. SLVDF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: GPPRF and SLVDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPPRF: 92% vs. SLVDF: 18%
Market capitalization -- GPPRF: $194.93M vs. SLVDF: $14.79M
GPPRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $194.93M. SLVDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $14.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPPRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLVDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GPPRF and SLVDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPPRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPPRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLVDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVDF is a better buy in the short-term than GPPRF.

Price Growth

GPPRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +14.11% price change this week, while SLVDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPPRF($195M) has a higher market cap than SLVDF($14.8M). GPPRF YTD gains are higher at: 93.286 vs. SLVDF (38.479). GPPRF has more cash in the bank: 10.8M vs. SLVDF (1.01M).
GPPRFSLVDFGPPRF / SLVDF
Capitalization195M14.8M1,318%
EBITDAN/A-1.12M-
Gain YTD93.28638.479242%
P/E Ratio4.22N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash10.8M1.01M1,075%
Total Debt3.17MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPPRF: Fundamental Ratings
GPPRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPPRFSLVDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGCB0.240.02
+7.74%
Tego Cyber Inc.
ACSYF0.80N/A
N/A
Accsys Technologies Plc.
BCAUF0.50N/A
N/A
Brilliance China Automotive Holding Ltd.
LLOBF2.15N/A
N/A
Lloyds Banking Group plc
OROVF15.70-2.03
-11.45%
Orient Overseas International Ltd.

GPPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPPRF and SLVDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPPRF and SLVDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPPRF
1D Price
Change %
GPPRF100%
+8.91%
SLVDF - GPPRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
HANNF - GPPRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
GRLVF - GPPRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
GPHOF - GPPRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
SRGXF - GPPRF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
More

SLVDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVDF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVDF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVDF
1D Price
Change %
SLVDF100%
+3.75%
PGEZF - SLVDF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
AAGFF - SLVDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
AZZTF - SLVDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.84%
ESKYF - SLVDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
GRSLF - SLVDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
More