GPLS
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.48M
TDCSF
Price
$9.00
Change
+$1.08 (+13.64%)
Updated
Feb 10 closing price
Capitalization
435.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPLS vs TDCSF

Header iconGPLS vs TDCSF Comparison
Open Charts GPLS vs TDCSFBanner chart's image
Geopulse Exploration
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$207.49K
Capitalization5.48M
Tdc Software Engineering
Price$9.00
Change+$1.08 (+13.64%)
Volume$629
Capitalization435.87M
GPLS vs TDCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPLS vs. TDCSF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPLS is a Hold and TDCSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GPLS: $0.04 vs. TDCSF: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: GPLS and TDCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPLS: 467% vs. TDCSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GPLS: $5.48M vs. TDCSF: $435.87M
GPLS [@Computer Communications] is valued at $5.48M. TDCSF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $435.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TDCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TDCSF is a better buy in the long-term than GPLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GPLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

GPLS (@Computer Communications) experienced а +57.41% price change this week, while TDCSF (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.85% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TDCSF($436M) has a higher market cap than GPLS($5.48M). GPLS YTD gains are higher at: 75.620 vs. TDCSF (13.636). TDCSF has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. GPLS (25.9K). GPLS has less debt than TDCSF: GPLS (56K) vs TDCSF (600M).
GPLSTDCSFGPLS / TDCSF
Capitalization5.48M436M1%
EBITDAN/A4.96B-
Gain YTD75.62013.636555%
P/E RatioN/A17.84-
RevenueN/A42.2B-
Total Cash25.9K13.4B0%
Total Debt56K600M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPLS: Fundamental Ratings
GPLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPLSTDCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAGT1.960.09
+4.81%
SAGTEC GLOBAL LIMITED
DEO110.250.51
+0.46%
Diageo plc
BCSF15.670.02
+0.13%
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
SPR40.84-0.34
-0.83%
Spirit Aerosystems Holdings
ZJK3.66-0.12
-3.17%
ZJK Industrial Co Ltd

GPLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPLS and MRINQ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPLS and MRINQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPLS
1D Price
Change %
GPLS100%
+41.67%
MRINQ - GPLS
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
RDWR - GPLS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
TDCSF - GPLS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUID - GPLS
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
IGGGF - GPLS
4%
Poorly correlated
+8.35%
More

TDCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDCSF has been closely correlated with JAPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TDCSF jumps, then JAPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDCSF
1D Price
Change %
TDCSF100%
N/A
JAPPF - TDCSF
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
MRINQ - TDCSF
46%
Loosely correlated
+6.67%
PSHPF - TDCSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPNAF - TDCSF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPNUF - TDCSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More