GPLS vs RDWR
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDWR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GPLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RDWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RDWR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RDWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GPLS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +21.38% price change this week, while RDWR (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
RDWR is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.38% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| GPLS | RDWR | GPLS / RDWR | |
| Capitalization | 30.2K | 782M | 0% |
| EBITDA | -37.97K | -19.44M | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 55.992 | -6.835 | -819% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 149.25 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 261M | - |
| Total Cash | 25.9K | 331M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 56K | 20.7M | 0% |
GPLS | RDWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GPLS's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as RDWR (95) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that GPLS’s stock grew similarly to RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
GPLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as RDWR (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that GPLS’s stock grew similarly to RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
RDWR's SMR Rating (90) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as GPLS (100) in the null industry. This means that RDWR’s stock grew similarly to GPLS’s over the last 12 months.
GPLS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as RDWR (54) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that GPLS’s stock grew similarly to RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
RDWR's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as GPLS (78) in the null industry. This means that RDWR’s stock grew similarly to GPLS’s over the last 12 months.
| RDWR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% |
GPLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GPLS and SNELF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPLS and SNELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPLS | 100% | N/A | ||
| SNELF - GPLS | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MRIN - GPLS | 25% Poorly correlated | -10.45% | ||
| RDWR - GPLS | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.37% | ||
| TDCSF - GPLS | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AUID - GPLS | 9% Poorly correlated | -14.31% | ||
More | ||||
RDWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDWR has been loosely correlated with NTCT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RDWR jumps, then NTCT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDWR | 100% | -5.37% | ||
| NTCT - RDWR | 40% Loosely correlated | -6.44% | ||
| MLNK - RDWR | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.93% | ||
| RNG - RDWR | 38% Loosely correlated | -6.03% | ||
| GUNGF - RDWR | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RPD - RDWR | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.78% | ||
More | ||||