GPI
Price
$470.28
Change
+$3.01 (+0.64%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.09B
48 days until earnings call
RUSHB
Price
$57.67
Change
+$0.09 (+0.16%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.46B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPI vs RUSHB

Header iconGPI vs RUSHB Comparison
Open Charts GPI vs RUSHBBanner chart's image
Group 1 Automotive
Price$470.28
Change+$3.01 (+0.64%)
Volume$143.56K
Capitalization6.09B
Rush Enterprises
Price$57.67
Change+$0.09 (+0.16%)
Volume$30.19K
Capitalization4.46B
GPI vs RUSHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPI vs. RUSHB commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPI is a Buy and RUSHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GPI: $470.28 vs. RUSHB: $57.67)
Brand notoriety: GPI and RUSHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPI: 86% vs. RUSHB: 50%
Market capitalization -- GPI: $6.09B vs. RUSHB: $4.46B
GPI [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $6.09B. RUSHB’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHB is a better buy in the long-term than GPI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPI is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHB.

Price Growth

GPI (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

GPI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.20% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPI($6.09B) has a higher market cap than RUSHB($4.46B). RUSHB has higher P/E ratio than GPI: RUSHB (16.49) vs GPI (12.99). GPI YTD gains are higher at: 11.952 vs. RUSHB (6.997). RUSHB has less debt than GPI: RUSHB (1.75B) vs GPI (5.47B).
GPIRUSHBGPI / RUSHB
Capitalization6.09B4.46B137%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.9526.997171%
P/E Ratio12.9916.4979%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash297MN/A-
Total Debt5.47B1.75B312%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPI vs RUSHB: Fundamental Ratings
GPI
RUSHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1979
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
712
SMR RATING
1..100
5357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1720
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHB's Valuation (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPI (73) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPI’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (12) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's SMR Rating (53) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (47) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (20) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPIRUSHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAFAX44.780.21
+0.47%
American Funds AMCAP 529A
COMSX29.930.11
+0.37%
DWS Digital Horizons S
FNKFX16.78N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6
LMVFX124.33-0.18
-0.14%
ClearBridge Value FI
GABPX50.31-0.20
-0.40%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income P

GPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPI has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPI jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPI
1D Price
Change %
GPI100%
+0.64%
AN - GPI
84%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
PAG - GPI
81%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
SAH - GPI
81%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
ABG - GPI
80%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
LAD - GPI
67%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More

RUSHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHB
1D Price
Change %
RUSHB100%
+0.16%
RUSHA - RUSHB
86%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
GPI - RUSHB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
AN - RUSHB
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
ABG - RUSHB
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
PAG - RUSHB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
More