It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPHBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
GPHBF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -4.67% price change this week, while MTX (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.
MTX is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
GPHBF | MTX | GPHBF / MTX | |
Capitalization | 2.47M | 2.4B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | 262M | - |
Gain YTD | -53.271 | 15.218 | -350% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 28.70 | - |
Revenue | N/A | 2.17B | - |
Total Cash | 1.15M | 322M | 0% |
Total Debt | 86K | 1.01B | 0% |
GPHBF | MTX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTX's Valuation (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GPHBF (91) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew similarly to GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.
MTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPHBF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.
MTX's SMR Rating (73) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GPHBF (98) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew similarly to GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.
MTX's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPHBF (92) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.
MTX's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GPHBF (100) in the null industry. This means that MTX’s stock grew similarly to GPHBF’s over the last 12 months.
MTX | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GPHBF and AVNT have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPHBF and AVNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPHBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPHBF | 100% | -4.58% | ||
AVNT - GPHBF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
OEC - GPHBF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
MTX - GPHBF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
OCLDF - GPHBF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
INCZY - GPHBF | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTX has been closely correlated with FUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTX jumps, then FUL could also see price increases.