GPGNF
Price
$1.45
Change
+$0.03 (+2.11%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
HLFDY
Price
$4.50
Change
+$0.01 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
622.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPGNF vs HLFDY

Header iconGPGNF vs HLFDY Comparison
Open Charts GPGNF vs HLFDYBanner chart's image
Grupo Gigante S.A.B. de C.V
Price$1.45
Change+$0.03 (+2.11%)
Volume$167
Capitalization1.92B
Halfords Group
Price$4.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.22%)
Volume$100
Capitalization622.42M
GPGNF vs HLFDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPGNF vs. HLFDY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGNF is a Hold and HLFDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GPGNF: $1.45 vs. HLFDY: $4.50)
Brand notoriety: GPGNF and HLFDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPGNF: 85% vs. HLFDY: 23%
Market capitalization -- GPGNF: $1.92B vs. HLFDY: $622.42M
GPGNF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.92B. HLFDY’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $622.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPGNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLFDY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPGNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLFDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLFDY is a better buy in the long-term than GPGNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPGNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLFDY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPGNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HLFDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPGNF is a better buy in the short-term than HLFDY.

Price Growth

GPGNF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLFDY (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPGNF($1.92B) has a higher market cap than HLFDY($622M). HLFDY has higher P/E ratio than GPGNF: HLFDY (15.17) vs GPGNF (12.21). HLFDY YTD gains are higher at: 42.857 vs. GPGNF (-7.643). GPGNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.51B vs. HLFDY (182M). GPGNF has more cash in the bank: 3.7B vs. HLFDY (63.6M). HLFDY has less debt than GPGNF: HLFDY (414M) vs GPGNF (15.5B). GPGNF has higher revenues than HLFDY: GPGNF (30.2B) vs HLFDY (1.44B).
GPGNFHLFDYGPGNF / HLFDY
Capitalization1.92B622M308%
EBITDA6.51B182M3,576%
Gain YTD-7.64342.857-18%
P/E Ratio12.2115.1780%
Revenue30.2B1.44B2,097%
Total Cash3.7B63.6M5,814%
Total Debt15.5B414M3,744%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPGNF vs HLFDY: Fundamental Ratings
GPGNF
HLFDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLFDY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as GPGNF (29). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew similarly to GPGNF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GPGNF (100). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew similarly to GPGNF’s over the last 12 months.

GPGNF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFDY (89). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to HLFDY’s over the last 12 months.

HLFDY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GPGNF (60). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew similarly to GPGNF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFDY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPGNF (48). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPGNFHLFDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSRLX75.280.55
+0.74%
Touchstone Large Cap Focused R6
SJVAX29.350.21
+0.72%
Steward Large Cap Value A
DFDMX37.620.19
+0.51%
DF Dent Midcap Growth Investor
GSIMX22.560.07
+0.31%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
IIMOX6.19-0.02
-0.32%
Voya MidCap Opportunities Port I

GPGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPGNF has been loosely correlated with BWMX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPGNF jumps, then BWMX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPGNF
1D Price
Change %
GPGNF100%
N/A
BWMX - GPGNF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
DUFRY - GPGNF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
IHCPF - GPGNF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - GPGNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFDY - GPGNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLFDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFDY and CYYHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFDY and CYYHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFDY
1D Price
Change %
HLFDY100%
N/A
CYYHF - HLFDY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHCPF - HLFDY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNLMY - HLFDY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPGNF - HLFDY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - HLFDY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More