GPGCF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$3.69 (-92.48%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
50.88M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEM
Price
$114.25
Change
-$2.89 (-2.47%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
127.83B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPGCF vs NEM

Header iconGPGCF vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts GPGCF vs NEMBanner chart's image
GREAT PACIFIC GOLD
Price$0.30
Change-$3.69 (-92.48%)
Volume$8.51K
Capitalization50.88M
Newmont
Price$114.25
Change-$2.89 (-2.47%)
Volume$5.88K
Capitalization127.83B
GPGCF vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
GPGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPGCF vs. NEM commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGCF is a Hold and NEM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (GPGCF: $0.30 vs. NEM: $117.14)
Brand notoriety: GPGCF: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPGCF: 9% vs. NEM: 116%
Market capitalization -- GPGCF: $50.88M vs. NEM: $127.83B
GPGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $50.88M. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $127.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $146.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than GPGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPGCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the short-term than GPGCF.

Price Growth

GPGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -19.77% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +95.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.25% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($128B) has a higher market cap than GPGCF($50.9M). NEM YTD gains are higher at: 17.316 vs. GPGCF (-9.041). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13B vs. GPGCF (-13.97M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 5.97B vs. GPGCF (17.5M). NEM has higher revenues than GPGCF: NEM (21.5B) vs GPGCF (0).
GPGCFNEMGPGCF / NEM
Capitalization50.9M128B0%
EBITDA-13.97M13B-0%
Gain YTD-9.04117.316-52%
P/E RatioN/A18.22-
Revenue021.5B-
Total Cash17.5M5.97B0%
Total DebtN/A5.65B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEM: Fundamental Ratings
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPGCFNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA421.960.15
+0.04%
Tesla
AAPL269.48-0.53
-0.20%
Apple
SPY689.53-5.88
-0.85%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X75633.550000-3055.218800
-3.88%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME24.52-1.33
-5.15%
GameStop Corp

GPGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPGCF and HMY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPGCF and HMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPGCF
1D Price
Change %
GPGCF100%
-7.27%
HMY - GPGCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
GFI - GPGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.09%
AU - GPGCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.21%
NEM - GPGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
DRD - GPGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
More

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
+3.80%
WPM - NEM
85%
Closely correlated
+3.46%
FNV - NEM
80%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
CGAU - NEM
80%
Closely correlated
+3.18%
AGI - NEM
79%
Closely correlated
+3.96%
GOLD - NEM
79%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
More