GPFOF
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.15 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
14.96B
OSBK
Price
$40.16
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
26.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPFOF vs OSBK

Header iconGPFOF vs OSBK Comparison
Open Charts GPFOF vs OSBKBanner chart's image
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.55
Change-$0.15 (-5.56%)
Volume$220
Capitalization14.96B
Oconee Financial
Price$40.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$1.43K
Capitalization26.89M
GPFOF vs OSBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPFOF vs. OSBK commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPFOF is a Hold and OSBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GPFOF: $2.55 vs. OSBK: $40.16)
Brand notoriety: GPFOF and OSBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPFOF: 8% vs. OSBK: 91%
Market capitalization -- GPFOF: $14.96B vs. OSBK: $26.89M
GPFOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.96B. OSBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $26.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPFOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOSBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OSBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OSBK is a better buy in the long-term than GPFOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPFOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSBK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OSBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OSBK is a better buy in the short-term than GPFOF.

Price Growth

GPFOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.39% price change this week, while OSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15B) has a higher market cap than OSBK($26.9M). GPFOF has higher P/E ratio than OSBK: GPFOF (9.60) vs OSBK (5.77). GPFOF YTD gains are higher at: 8.511 vs. OSBK (4.439). OSBK has less debt than GPFOF: OSBK (9.82M) vs GPFOF (68.2B). GPFOF has higher revenues than OSBK: GPFOF (62.4B) vs OSBK (22.4M).
GPFOFOSBKGPFOF / OSBK
Capitalization15B26.9M55,762%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.5114.439192%
P/E Ratio9.605.77166%
Revenue62.4B22.4M278,571%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt68.2B9.82M694,218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPFOF vs OSBK: Fundamental Ratings
GPFOF
OSBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3351
SMR RATING
1..100
254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6915
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OSBK's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (52). This means that OSBK’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as OSBK (51). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to OSBK’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSBK (54). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSBK’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as OSBK (57). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to OSBK’s over the last 12 months.

OSBK's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (69). This means that OSBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPFOFOSBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWAV0.270.01
+2.60%
Greenwave Technology Solutions Inc.
INFA24.59N/A
N/A
Informatica
BKE49.07-0.02
-0.04%
Buckle (The)
ONDS2.13-0.01
-0.47%
Ondas Holdings
SWIM6.88-0.04
-0.58%
Latham Group

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with MCHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then MCHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
MCHB - GPFOF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEOB - GPFOF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
OSBK - GPFOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNMB - GPFOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - GPFOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
More

OSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSBK and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSBK and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSBK
1D Price
Change %
OSBK100%
N/A
MCHB - OSBK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - OSBK
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
GPFOF - OSBK
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IROQ - OSBK
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OXBC - OSBK
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
More