GPFOF
Price
$2.56
Change
-$0.06 (-2.29%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
14.96B
MNMB
Price
$38.55
Change
+$0.30 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
49.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPFOF vs MNMB

Header iconGPFOF vs MNMB Comparison
Open Charts GPFOF vs MNMBBanner chart's image
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.56
Change-$0.06 (-2.29%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization14.96B
Merchants & Marine Ban
Price$38.55
Change+$0.30 (+0.78%)
Volume$976
Capitalization49.89M
GPFOF vs MNMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPFOF vs. MNMB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPFOF is a Hold and MNMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GPFOF: $2.56 vs. MNMB: $38.55)
Brand notoriety: GPFOF and MNMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPFOF: 116% vs. MNMB: 149%
Market capitalization -- GPFOF: $14.96B vs. MNMB: $49.89M
GPFOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.96B. MNMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPFOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the long-term than MNMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPFOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MNMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNMB is a better buy in the short-term than GPFOF.

Price Growth

GPFOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.29% price change this week, while MNMB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15B) has a higher market cap than MNMB($49.9M). MNMB has higher P/E ratio than GPFOF: MNMB (12.56) vs GPFOF (9.60). GPFOF YTD gains are higher at: 8.936 vs. MNMB (-7.269). MNMB has less debt than GPFOF: MNMB (530K) vs GPFOF (68.2B). GPFOF has higher revenues than MNMB: GPFOF (62.4B) vs MNMB (32.3M).
GPFOFMNMBGPFOF / MNMB
Capitalization15B49.9M30,060%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.936-7.269-123%
P/E Ratio9.6012.5676%
Revenue62.4B32.3M193,189%
Total CashN/A47.6M-
Total Debt68.2B530K12,867,925%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPFOF vs MNMB: Fundamental Ratings
GPFOF
MNMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3041
SMR RATING
1..100
265
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5378
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6580
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNMB's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (56). This means that MNMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as MNMB (41). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to MNMB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNMB (65). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNMB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MNMB (78). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to MNMB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as MNMB (80). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to MNMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPFOFMNMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TKOMF39.960.64
+1.63%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
OGNRF1.450.01
+0.49%
Orogen Royalties Inc.
FZMD0.07N/A
N/A
Fuse Medical, Inc.
IDKOF5.53N/A
N/A
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.
BKALF0.06N/A
N/A
Bank Aladin Syariah TBK PT

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with MCHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then MCHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
MCHB - GPFOF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEOB - GPFOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSBK - GPFOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNMB - GPFOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - GPFOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNMB and FBPA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNMB and FBPA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNMB
1D Price
Change %
MNMB100%
N/A
FBPA - MNMB
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
GPFOF - MNMB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHB - MNMB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLYBY - MNMB
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
MNAT - MNMB
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More