GPFOF
Price
$2.63
Change
+$0.09 (+3.54%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.72B
MCHB
Price
$13.06
Change
-$43464.94 (-99.97%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.88B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPFOF vs MCHB

Header iconGPFOF vs MCHB Comparison
Open Charts GPFOF vs MCHBBanner chart's image
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.63
Change+$0.09 (+3.54%)
Volume$500
Capitalization16.72B
Mechanics Ban
Price$13.06
Change-$43464.94 (-99.97%)
Volume$2.77K
Capitalization2.88B
GPFOF vs MCHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPFOF vs. MCHB commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPFOF is a Hold and MCHB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GPFOF: $2.63 vs. MCHB: $13.05)
Brand notoriety: GPFOF and MCHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPFOF: 20% vs. MCHB: 353%
Market capitalization -- GPFOF: $16.72B vs. MCHB: $2.88B
GPFOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.72B. MCHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPFOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPFOF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the short-term than MCHB.

Price Growth

GPFOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.54% price change this week, while MCHB (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCHB is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($16.7B) has a higher market cap than MCHB($2.88B). MCHB has higher P/E ratio than GPFOF: MCHB (15.49) vs GPFOF (7.83). GPFOF YTD gains are higher at: 11.915 vs. MCHB (-99.951).
GPFOFMCHBGPFOF / MCHB
Capitalization16.7B2.88B579%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.915-99.951-12%
P/E Ratio7.8315.4951%
Revenue85.7BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt51.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPFOF vs MCHB: Fundamental Ratings
GPFOF
MCHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
215
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5199
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPFOF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (64). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHB (100). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (15). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (99). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (71). This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPFOFMCHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
47%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHRIX18.800.15
+0.80%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs I
OANWX25.61-0.01
-0.04%
Oakmark Global Select Institutional
FOBPX20.91-0.02
-0.10%
Tributary Balanced Instl Plus
CGIIX51.23-0.05
-0.10%
Calamos Growth & Income I
PRBLX65.13-0.14
-0.21%
Parnassus Core Equity Investor

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with MCHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then MCHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
MCHB - GPFOF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
BEOB - GPFOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSBK - GPFOF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
MNMB - GPFOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - GPFOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

MCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHB
1D Price
Change %
MCHB100%
-0.38%
GPFOF - MCHB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OSBK - MCHB
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
BLX - MCHB
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
FBPA - MCHB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More