GPFOF
Price
$2.77
Change
+$0.15 (+5.70%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
17.07B
MCHB
Price
$13.91
Change
+$0.16 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPFOF vs MCHB

Header iconGPFOF vs MCHB Comparison
Open Charts GPFOF vs MCHBBanner chart's image
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.77
Change+$0.15 (+5.70%)
Volume$200
Capitalization17.07B
Mechanics Ban
Price$13.91
Change+$0.16 (+1.16%)
Volume$256.87K
Capitalization3.06B
GPFOF vs MCHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPFOF vs. MCHB commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPFOF is a Buy and MCHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GPFOF: $2.78 vs. MCHB: $13.91)
Brand notoriety: GPFOF and MCHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPFOF: 11% vs. MCHB: 196%
Market capitalization -- GPFOF: $17.07B vs. MCHB: $3.06B
GPFOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $17.07B. MCHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPFOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPFOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHB is a better buy in the short-term than GPFOF.

Price Growth

GPFOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.51% price change this week, while MCHB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCHB is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($17.1B) has a higher market cap than MCHB($3.06B). MCHB has higher P/E ratio than GPFOF: MCHB (16.51) vs GPFOF (8.13). GPFOF YTD gains are higher at: 18.085 vs. MCHB (-99.948).
GPFOFMCHBGPFOF / MCHB
Capitalization17.1B3.06B559%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.085-99.948-18%
P/E Ratio8.1316.5149%
Revenue85.7BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt51.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPFOF vs MCHB: Fundamental Ratings
GPFOF
MCHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2489
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
215
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4699
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPFOF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (68). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHB (100). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (15). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (99). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (51). This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPFOFMCHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEURX42.440.47
+1.12%
Vanguard European Stock Investor
MINVX29.000.29
+1.01%
Madison Large Cap Y
AADEX29.230.29
+1.00%
American Beacon Large Cap Value R5
BEGIX22.240.20
+0.91%
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl
ETAEX14.27-0.02
-0.14%
Eventide Exponential Technologies A

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with MCHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then MCHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
MCHB - GPFOF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
BEOB - GPFOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSBK - GPFOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNMB - GPFOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - GPFOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More

MCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHB
1D Price
Change %
MCHB100%
+1.16%
GPFOF - MCHB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OSBK - MCHB
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLX - MCHB
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
FBPA - MCHB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More