GPDNF
Price
$84.65
Change
-$3.30 (-3.75%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
55.09B
PAVS
Price
$0.98
Change
+$0.06 (+6.52%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
65.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPDNF vs PAVS

Header iconGPDNF vs PAVS Comparison
Open Charts GPDNF vs PAVSBanner chart's image
Danone
Price$84.65
Change-$3.30 (-3.75%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization55.09B
Paranovus Entertainment Technology
Price$0.98
Change+$0.06 (+6.52%)
Volume$528.86K
Capitalization65.99M
GPDNF vs PAVS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPDNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPDNF vs. PAVS commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPDNF is a Hold and PAVS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (GPDNF: $84.65 vs. PAVS: $0.98)
Brand notoriety: GPDNF and PAVS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPDNF: 94% vs. PAVS: 222%
Market capitalization -- GPDNF: $55.09B vs. PAVS: $65.99M
GPDNF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $55.09B. PAVS’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $65.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $231.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPDNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAVS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPDNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPDNF is a better buy in the long-term than PAVS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPDNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAVS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPDNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAVS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GPDNF and PAVS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GPDNF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -3.79% price change this week, while PAVS (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +15.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +187.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.27% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPDNF($55.1B) has a higher market cap than PAVS($66M). GPDNF has higher P/E ratio than PAVS: GPDNF (25.17) vs PAVS (1.78). GPDNF YTD gains are higher at: 28.161 vs. PAVS (-28.363). PAVS has less debt than GPDNF: PAVS (2.24M) vs GPDNF (14.5B).
GPDNFPAVSGPDNF / PAVS
Capitalization55.1B66M83,485%
EBITDA4.53BN/A-
Gain YTD28.161-28.363-99%
P/E Ratio25.171.781,412%
Revenue27.4BN/A-
Total Cash6.02BN/A-
Total Debt14.5B2.24M647,033%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPDNF vs PAVS: Fundamental Ratings
GPDNF
PAVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
281
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
9792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7545

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPDNF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAVS (91). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAVS’s over the last 12 months.

GPDNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAVS (100). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAVS’s over the last 12 months.

PAVS's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GPDNF (97). This means that PAVS’s stock grew similarly to GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

PAVS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GPDNF (49). This means that PAVS’s stock grew similarly to GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

PAVS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GPDNF (88). This means that PAVS’s stock grew significantly faster than GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPDNFPAVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPDNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VMD6.780.03
+0.44%
Viemed Healthcare
AMTM22.590.03
+0.13%
Amentum Holdings Inc
ORLY103.47-0.26
-0.25%
O'Reilly Automotive Inc
CVU2.54-0.01
-0.39%
CPI Aerostructures
PCRX26.05-0.16
-0.61%
Pacira BioSciences

GPDNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPDNF has been loosely correlated with DANOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPDNF jumps, then DANOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPDNF
1D Price
Change %
GPDNF100%
-3.75%
DANOY - GPDNF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
NIPMY - GPDNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRGY - GPDNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
NSRGF - GPDNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
PAVS - GPDNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.52%
More

PAVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAVS has been loosely correlated with CHFLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAVS jumps, then CHFLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAVS
1D Price
Change %
PAVS100%
+6.52%
CHFLF - PAVS
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NAII - PAVS
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
PIFMY - PAVS
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - PAVS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPDNF - PAVS
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
More