Advertisement
GPDNF vs NIPMY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPDNF is a Buy and NIPMY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPDNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIPMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GPDNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NIPMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GPDNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GPDNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GPDNF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while NIPMY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| GPDNF | NIPMY | GPDNF / NIPMY | |
| Capitalization | 39.3B | 2.99B | 1,315% |
| EBITDA | 4B | 86.4B | 5% |
| Gain YTD | 24.118 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 37.74 | 19.92 | 189% |
| Revenue | 27.7B | 1.24T | 2% |
| Total Cash | 4.68B | 81.2B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 237B | 6% |
GPDNF | NIPMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GPDNF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPMY (37). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.
GPDNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPMY (83). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.
NIPMY's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GPDNF (98). This means that NIPMY’s stock grew significantly faster than GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.
GPDNF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPMY (56). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.
NIPMY's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as GPDNF (94). This means that NIPMY’s stock grew similarly to GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.
| GPDNF | NIPMY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 11% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 11% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | N/A |
Advertisement
GPDNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPDNF has been loosely correlated with DANOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPDNF jumps, then DANOY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPDNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPDNF | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| DANOY - GPDNF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| NIPMY - GPDNF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSRGY - GPDNF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| NSRGF - GPDNF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| PAVS - GPDNF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NIPMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPMY and DANOY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPMY and DANOY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIPMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIPMY | 100% | N/A | ||
| DANOY - NIPMY | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| GPDNF - NIPMY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| K - NIPMY | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| NSRGY - NIPMY | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| NSRGF - NIPMY | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||