GPDNF
Price
$82.26
Change
-$2.14 (-2.54%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
53.81B
NIPMY
Price
$17.00
Change
+$0.75 (+4.62%)
Updated
Aug 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPDNF vs NIPMY

Header iconGPDNF vs NIPMY Comparison
Open Charts GPDNF vs NIPMYBanner chart's image
Danone
Price$82.26
Change-$2.14 (-2.54%)
Volume$787
Capitalization53.81B
NH Foods
Price$17.00
Change+$0.75 (+4.62%)
Volume$405
Capitalization3.81B
GPDNF vs NIPMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPDNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPDNF vs. NIPMY commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPDNF is a Hold and NIPMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (GPDNF: $86.00 vs. NIPMY: $17.00)
Brand notoriety: GPDNF and NIPMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPDNF: 133% vs. NIPMY: 100%
Market capitalization -- GPDNF: $53.81B vs. NIPMY: $3.81B
GPDNF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $53.81B. NIPMY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $240.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPDNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIPMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPDNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NIPMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIPMY is a better buy in the long-term than GPDNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPDNF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GPDNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GPDNF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while NIPMY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +659.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.35% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPDNF($53.8B) has a higher market cap than NIPMY($3.81B). GPDNF has higher P/E ratio than NIPMY: GPDNF (25.81) vs NIPMY (18.62). GPDNF YTD gains are higher at: 30.205 vs. NIPMY (0.000). NIPMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 82.1B vs. GPDNF (4.53B). NIPMY has more cash in the bank: 79B vs. GPDNF (6.02B). GPDNF has less debt than NIPMY: GPDNF (14.5B) vs NIPMY (236B). NIPMY has higher revenues than GPDNF: NIPMY (1.34T) vs GPDNF (27.4B).
GPDNFNIPMYGPDNF / NIPMY
Capitalization53.8B3.81B1,413%
EBITDA4.53B82.1B6%
Gain YTD30.2050.000-
P/E Ratio25.8118.62139%
Revenue27.4B1.34T2%
Total Cash6.02B79B8%
Total Debt14.5B236B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPDNF vs NIPMY: Fundamental Ratings
GPDNF
NIPMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
9737
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5371
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9066
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8545

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPDNF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPMY (33). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.

GPDNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIPMY (100). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.

NIPMY's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPDNF (97). This means that NIPMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

GPDNF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPMY (71). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.

NIPMY's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as GPDNF (90). This means that NIPMY’s stock grew similarly to GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPDNFNIPMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
41%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPDNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDXU128.0610.11
+8.57%
MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN
CALI50.51N/A
N/A
iShares Short-Term CA Muni Act ETF
TPSC41.34-0.26
-0.62%
Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF
VPC20.67-0.15
-0.72%
Virtus Private Credit ETF
FINE21.91-0.25
-1.13%
Themes European Luxury ETF

GPDNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPDNF has been loosely correlated with DANOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPDNF jumps, then DANOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPDNF
1D Price
Change %
GPDNF100%
+4.55%
DANOY - GPDNF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
NIPMY - GPDNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRGY - GPDNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
NSRGF - GPDNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
PAVS - GPDNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
More

NIPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPMY and DANOY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPMY and DANOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPMY
1D Price
Change %
NIPMY100%
N/A
DANOY - NIPMY
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
GPDNF - NIPMY
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
K - NIPMY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
NSRGY - NIPMY
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
NSRGF - NIPMY
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More