GPAGF
Price
$15.77
Change
-$3.18 (-16.78%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.91B
HLNFF
Price
$13.24
Change
-$0.08 (-0.60%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
300.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPAGF vs HLNFF

Header iconGPAGF vs HLNFF Comparison
Open Charts GPAGF vs HLNFFBanner chart's image
Gruma S.A.B. de CV
Price$15.77
Change-$3.18 (-16.78%)
Volume$500
Capitalization6.91B
High Liner Foods
Price$13.24
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
Volume$500
Capitalization300.75M
GPAGF vs HLNFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPAGF vs. HLNFF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAGF is a Hold and HLNFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GPAGF: $15.77 vs. HLNFF: $13.24)
Brand notoriety: GPAGF and HLNFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPAGF: 126% vs. HLNFF: 20%
Market capitalization -- GPAGF: $6.91B vs. HLNFF: $300.75M
GPAGF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.91B. HLNFF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $300.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLNFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNFF is a better buy in the long-term than GPAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPAGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPAGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLNFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPAGF is a better buy in the short-term than HLNFF.

Price Growth

GPAGF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -16.78% price change this week, while HLNFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPAGF($6.91B) has a higher market cap than HLNFF($301M). GPAGF has higher P/E ratio than HLNFF: GPAGF (16.68) vs HLNFF (10.30). HLNFF YTD gains are higher at: 18.993 vs. GPAGF (-1.437). GPAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 727M vs. HLNFF (85.2M). GPAGF has more cash in the bank: 239M vs. HLNFF (10.5M). HLNFF has less debt than GPAGF: HLNFF (254M) vs GPAGF (1.71B). GPAGF has higher revenues than HLNFF: GPAGF (5B) vs HLNFF (1.08B).
GPAGFHLNFFGPAGF / HLNFF
Capitalization6.91B301M2,295%
EBITDA727M85.2M853%
Gain YTD-1.43718.993-8%
P/E Ratio16.6810.30162%
Revenue5B1.08B463%
Total Cash239M10.5M2,276%
Total Debt1.71B254M674%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPAGF vs HLNFF: Fundamental Ratings
GPAGF
HLNFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9667
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4321
SMR RATING
1..100
3455
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLNFF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (45). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

HLNFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (43). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HLNFF (55). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to HLNFF’s over the last 12 months.

HLNFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPAGF (81). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

HLNFF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (86). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPAGFHLNFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBSTX51.150.35
+0.69%
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Tr
NWAPX35.270.07
+0.20%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc Egl
MSFRX19.580.02
+0.10%
MFS Total Return A
DHSCX22.75N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Small Cap Inv
ARDGX27.38N/A
N/A
Archer Dividend Growth

GPAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPAGF has been loosely correlated with FAMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPAGF jumps, then FAMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPAGF
1D Price
Change %
GPAGF100%
N/A
FAMI - GPAGF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
HLNFF - GPAGF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GPAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - GPAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
GUZOF - GPAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLNFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLNFF and GPAGF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLNFF and GPAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNFF
1D Price
Change %
HLNFF100%
N/A
GPAGF - HLNFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYAF - HLNFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - HLNFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - HLNFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUZOF - HLNFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More