GPAGF
Price
$20.62
Change
+$3.21 (+18.44%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.23B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GRBMF
Price
$3.60
Change
+$0.27 (+8.11%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPAGF vs GRBMF

Header iconGPAGF vs GRBMF Comparison
Open Charts GPAGF vs GRBMFBanner chart's image
Gruma S.A.B. de CV
Price$20.62
Change+$3.21 (+18.44%)
Volume$1.53K
Capitalization6.23B
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$3.60
Change+$0.27 (+8.11%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization15.02B
GPAGF vs GRBMF Comparison Chart in %
GPAGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GRBMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPAGF vs. GRBMF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAGF is a Hold and GRBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (GPAGF: $17.00 vs. GRBMF: $3.60)
Brand notoriety: GPAGF and GRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPAGF: 74% vs. GRBMF: 25%
Market capitalization -- GPAGF: $6.23B vs. GRBMF: $15.02B
GPAGF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $6.23B. GRBMF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $15.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $251.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GPAGF and GRBMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPAGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRBMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GRBMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRBMF is a better buy in the short-term than GPAGF.

Price Growth

GPAGF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRBMF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +232.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.79% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRBMF($15B) has a higher market cap than GPAGF($6.23B). GRBMF has higher P/E ratio than GPAGF: GRBMF (24.01) vs GPAGF (11.04). GRBMF YTD gains are higher at: 12.500 vs. GPAGF (-8.578). GRBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.1B vs. GPAGF (1.07B). GRBMF has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. GPAGF (462M). GPAGF has less debt than GRBMF: GPAGF (1.82B) vs GRBMF (193B). GRBMF has higher revenues than GPAGF: GRBMF (429B) vs GPAGF (6.34B).
GPAGFGRBMFGPAGF / GRBMF
Capitalization6.23B15B42%
EBITDA1.07B58.1B2%
Gain YTD-8.57812.500-69%
P/E Ratio11.0424.0146%
Revenue6.34B429B1%
Total Cash462M14.4B3%
Total Debt1.82B193B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPAGF vs GRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
GPAGF
GRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3396
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5773
SMR RATING
1..100
3572
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPAGF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (54). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (73). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRBMF (72). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (77). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPAGF (67). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPAGFGRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPAGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GRBMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PESPX28.350.05
+0.18%
BNY Mellon MidCap Index Inv
BHCUX20.82-0.15
-0.72%
Baron Health Care R6
RGOIX24.14-0.26
-1.07%
RBC Global Opportunities I
CICEX62.60-0.71
-1.12%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer 529E
CTCAX104.25-2.71
-2.53%
Columbia Global Technology Growth A

GPAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPAGF has been loosely correlated with FAMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPAGF jumps, then FAMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPAGF
1D Price
Change %
GPAGF100%
N/A
FAMI - GPAGF
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.51%
HLNFF - GPAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GPAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+11.11%
FPAFY - GPAGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
FTLF - GPAGF
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
More

GRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRBMF and BMBOY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRBMF and BMBOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRBMF
1D Price
Change %
GRBMF100%
+11.11%
BMBOY - GRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
GLUC - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
-9.23%
GPAGF - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - GRBMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - GRBMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More