Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMEBX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
Price$62.16
Change+$0.68 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets521.39M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GPAFX (521M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GPAFX (0.85). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GPAFX (53 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GPAFX (0.91). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GPAFX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMEBX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. GPAFX (-5.80). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. GPAFX (36.25).
| GPAFX | RMEBX | GPAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.373 | 13.527 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.05 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.80 | 4.81 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.47 | 38.19 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.25 | 55.95 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.54 | 89.36 | 16% |