Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMEBX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
Price$61.01
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.82M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GPAFX (526M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GPAFX (0.87). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GPAFX (53 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GPAFX (0.91). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GPAFX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMEBX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. GPAFX (-2.88). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. GPAFX (37.77).
| GPAFX | RMEBX | GPAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.615 | 11.308 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 526M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 7.57 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.31 | 31.59 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.77 | 55.29 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.39 | 89.40 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers