Advertisement
GPACU vs MNTN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPACU is a Hold and MNTN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPACU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNTN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GPACU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MNTN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNTN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MNTN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GPACU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while MNTN (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +7.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.67%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +59.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
MNTN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+7.73% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Packaged Software (+0.46% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| GPACU | MNTN | GPACU / MNTN | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 882M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | 4.72M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.921 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 273M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 179M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 51.3M | - |
GPACU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 4 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MNTN | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 8% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 23% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 31% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 7% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MISL | 48.01 | 1.28 | +2.74% |
| First Trust Indxx Aerspc & Defns ETF | |||
| RFI | 11.08 | 0.05 | +0.45% |
| Cohen and Steers Total Return Realty Fund | |||
| JANT | 41.69 | 0.16 | +0.39% |
| AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Jan ETF | |||
| XLRI | 23.75 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| State Street® RlEsttSelSectSPDR®PrmETF | |||
| NGELF | 0.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Nge Cap Ltd. | |||
GPACU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPACU has been loosely correlated with MNTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPACU jumps, then MNTN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPACU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPACU | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| MNTN - GPACU | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| IRRX - GPACU | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JWSMF - GPACU | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HAIUF - GPACU | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MLACU - GPACU | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MNTN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNTN has been loosely correlated with GPACU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNTN jumps, then GPACU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNTN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNTN | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| GPACU - MNTN | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DOMO - MNTN | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| EONR - MNTN | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| SLAMF - MNTN | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASCBF - MNTN | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||