GOOS
Price
$12.06
Change
+$0.18 (+1.52%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.17B
38 days until earnings call
PMMAF
Price
$27.73
Change
+$0.50 (+1.84%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.08B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOOS vs PMMAF

Header iconGOOS vs PMMAF Comparison
Open Charts GOOS vs PMMAFBanner chart's image
Canada Goose Holdings
Price$12.06
Change+$0.18 (+1.52%)
Volume$668.27K
Capitalization1.17B
Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport
Price$27.73
Change+$0.50 (+1.84%)
Volume$803
Capitalization10.08B
GOOS vs PMMAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GOOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOOS vs. PMMAF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOOS is a Hold and PMMAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GOOS: $12.06 vs. PMMAF: $27.74)
Brand notoriety: GOOS: Notable vs. PMMAF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOOS: 52% vs. PMMAF: 145%
Market capitalization -- GOOS: $1.17B vs. PMMAF: $10.08B
GOOS [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $1.17B. PMMAF’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $10.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOOS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMMAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GOOS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMMAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GOOS is a better buy in the long-term than PMMAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOOS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMMAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOOS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PMMAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMMAF is a better buy in the short-term than GOOS.

Price Growth

GOOS (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +4.06% price change this week, while PMMAF (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

GOOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

PMMAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+4.23% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMMAF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than GOOS($1.17B). GOOS has higher P/E ratio than PMMAF: GOOS (33.97) vs PMMAF (25.91). GOOS YTD gains are higher at: 20.239 vs. PMMAF (-40.342). PMMAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 655M vs. GOOS (216M). PMMAF has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. GOOS (154M). GOOS has less debt than PMMAF: GOOS (741M) vs PMMAF (1.21B). PMMAF has higher revenues than GOOS: PMMAF (8.74B) vs GOOS (1.27B).
GOOSPMMAFGOOS / PMMAF
Capitalization1.17B10.1B12%
EBITDA216M655M33%
Gain YTD20.239-40.342-50%
P/E Ratio33.9725.91131%
Revenue1.27B8.74B15%
Total Cash154M289M53%
Total Debt741M1.21B61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOOS vs PMMAF: Fundamental Ratings
GOOS
PMMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9381
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMMAF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GOOS (92) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that PMMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GOOS’s over the last 12 months.

PMMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GOOS (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that PMMAF’s stock grew similarly to GOOS’s over the last 12 months.

GOOS's SMR Rating (46) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PMMAF (78) in the null industry. This means that GOOS’s stock grew similarly to PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

GOOS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PMMAF (60) in the null industry. This means that GOOS’s stock grew similarly to PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.

PMMAF's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as GOOS (93) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that PMMAF’s stock grew similarly to GOOS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOOSPMMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LADTX29.010.43
+1.50%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R5
FAFCX35.680.36
+1.02%
Fidelity Advisor Financials C
RYFNX95.160.74
+0.78%
Rydex Financial Services A
LGCYX18.990.13
+0.69%
Lord Abbett Global Equity I
DHLRX34.330.09
+0.26%
Diamond Hill Large Cap I

GOOS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOS has been loosely correlated with ZGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GOOS jumps, then ZGN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOOS
1D Price
Change %
GOOS100%
+1.52%
ZGN - GOOS
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
LEVI - GOOS
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
UAA - GOOS
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
RL - GOOS
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
PVH - GOOS
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

PMMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMMAF and PUMSY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMMAF and PUMSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMAF
1D Price
Change %
PMMAF100%
N/A
PUMSY - PMMAF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
GOOS - PMMAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
MONRF - PMMAF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MONRY - PMMAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
SEPGF - PMMAF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More