GOODN
Price
$22.50
Change
-$0.10 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MFA
Price
$9.48
Change
+$0.06 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOODN vs MFA

Header iconGOODN vs MFA Comparison
Open Charts GOODN vs MFABanner chart's image
Gladstone Commercial
Price$22.50
Change-$0.10 (-0.44%)
Volume$494
CapitalizationN/A
MFA Financial
Price$9.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.64%)
Volume$837.46K
Capitalization1.16B
GOODN vs MFA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GOODN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOODN vs. MFA commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOODN is a StrongBuy and MFA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GOODN: $22.50 vs. MFA: $9.48)
Brand notoriety: GOODN and MFA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOODN: 21% vs. MFA: 68%
Market capitalization -- GOODN: $0 vs. MFA: $1.16B
GOODN [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $0. MFA’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOODN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GOODN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFA is a better buy in the long-term than GOODN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOODN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOODN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOODN is a better buy in the short-term than MFA.

Price Growth

GOODN (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while MFA (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +3.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.93% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GOODN YTD gains are higher at: 3.930 vs. MFA (0.052). GOODN has less debt than MFA: GOODN (744M) vs MFA (5B). MFA has higher revenues than GOODN: MFA (205M) vs GOODN (148M).
GOODNMFAGOODN / MFA
CapitalizationN/A1.17B-
EBITDA100MN/A-
Gain YTD3.9300.0527,524%
P/E RatioN/A24.43-
Revenue148M205M72%
Total Cash12MN/A-
Total Debt744M5B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOODN vs MFA: Fundamental Ratings
GOODN
MFA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6057
SMR RATING
1..100
10020
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8524

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFA's Valuation (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GOODN (11) in the null industry. This means that MFA’s stock grew similarly to GOODN’s over the last 12 months.

MFA's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GOODN (60) in the null industry. This means that MFA’s stock grew similarly to GOODN’s over the last 12 months.

MFA's SMR Rating (20) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOODN (100) in the null industry. This means that MFA’s stock grew significantly faster than GOODN’s over the last 12 months.

MFA's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GOODN (56) in the null industry. This means that MFA’s stock grew similarly to GOODN’s over the last 12 months.

MFA's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GOODN (100) in the null industry. This means that MFA’s stock grew similarly to GOODN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOODNMFA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOODN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVD3.730.12
+3.32%
American Vanguard Corp
DAC92.240.02
+0.02%
Danaos Corp
ROIV11.38N/A
N/A
Roivant Sciences Ltd
FITBO19.88N/A
N/A
Fifth Third Bancorp
LIEN10.28-0.03
-0.29%
Chicago Atlantic BDC Inc

GOODN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GOODN and EFC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GOODN and EFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOODN
1D Price
Change %
GOODN100%
-0.44%
EFC - GOODN
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
ORC - GOODN
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFA - GOODN
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
GOODO - GOODN
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
ARR - GOODN
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
More

MFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFA has been closely correlated with NLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFA jumps, then NLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFA
1D Price
Change %
MFA100%
+0.64%
NLY - MFA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
RWT - MFA
77%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
RITM - MFA
77%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
CIM - MFA
76%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
STWD - MFA
75%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
More