GOLF
Price
$73.32
Change
+$0.05 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.19B
32 days until earnings call
LFEV
Price
$0.75
Change
+$0.24 (+47.06%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
102.03K
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOLF vs LFEV

Header iconGOLF vs LFEV Comparison
Open Charts GOLF vs LFEVBanner chart's image
Acushnet Holdings
Price$73.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
Volume$635.5K
Capitalization4.19B
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
Price$0.75
Change+$0.24 (+47.06%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization102.03K
GOLF vs LFEV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOLF vs. LFEV commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOLF is a Buy and LFEV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GOLF: $73.32 vs. LFEV: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: GOLF and LFEV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOLF: 151% vs. LFEV: 232%
Market capitalization -- GOLF: $4.19B vs. LFEV: $102.03K
GOLF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $4.19B. LFEV’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $102.03K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GOLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LFEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GOLF is a better buy in the long-term than LFEV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFEV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LFEV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOLF is a better buy in the short-term than LFEV.

Price Growth

GOLF (@Recreational Products) experienced а +2.95% price change this week, while LFEV (@Recreational Products) price change was +22.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

GOLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.03% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GOLF($4.19B) has a higher market cap than LFEV($102K). LFEV YTD gains are higher at: 176.716 vs. GOLF (3.851).
GOLFLFEVGOLF / LFEV
Capitalization4.19B102K4,104,902%
EBITDA337MN/A-
Gain YTD3.851176.7162%
P/E Ratio22.79N/A-
Revenue2.38BN/A-
Total Cash65.4MN/A-
Total Debt701MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOLF vs LFEV: Fundamental Ratings
GOLF
LFEV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2697
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
35100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GOLF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LFEV (54). This means that GOLF’s stock grew similarly to LFEV’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LFEV (100). This means that GOLF’s stock grew significantly faster than LFEV’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFEV (100). This means that GOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFEV’s over the last 12 months.

LFEV's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GOLF (48). This means that LFEV’s stock grew similarly to GOLF’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFEV (100). This means that GOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFEV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOLFLFEV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEITX13.560.12
+0.89%
SEI International Equity F (SIT)
SRFMX14.820.11
+0.76%
Sarofim Equity
AVEDX23.460.08
+0.34%
Ave Maria Rising Dividend
FSWFX72.470.22
+0.30%
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
CSSZX21.040.05
+0.24%
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst

GOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOLF has been loosely correlated with YETI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GOLF jumps, then YETI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOLF
1D Price
Change %
GOLF100%
+0.07%
YETI - GOLF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
BC - GOLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
PII - GOLF
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
HOG - GOLF
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
LCII - GOLF
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
More

LFEV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFEV has been loosely correlated with RNDOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFEV jumps, then RNDOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFEV
1D Price
Change %
LFEV100%
N/A
RNDOF - LFEV
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LTH - LFEV
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
GOLF - LFEV
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
MSGE - LFEV
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
DSHK - LFEV
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
More