Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GNR vs PYZ
GNR vs PYZ Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs PYZ
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$59.34
Change+$0.49 (+0.83%)
Volume$154.56K
Net Assets3.37B
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
Price$105.46
Change-$1.02 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.05M
GNR vs PYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. PYZ commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a Hold and PYZ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.37B vs. PYZ (55M). PYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: PYZ (23.364) vs GNR (20.975). GNR was incepted earlier than PYZ: GNR (15 years) vs PYZ (19 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than PYZ (0.60). PYZ has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | PYZ | GNR / PYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 20.975 | 23.364 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 55M | 6,120% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.60 | 67% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 69.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 3.66 | 0.93 | 395% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | PYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 12 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| SHEL - GNR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| RIO - GNR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| SLB - GNR | 73% Closely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| VALE - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| CNQ - GNR | 71% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
PYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PYZ and CDE have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PYZ and CDE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| CDE - PYZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
| RGLD - PYZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
| CE - PYZ | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| MTRN - PYZ | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| FUL - PYZ | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
More | ||||