GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
Gain YTD | 7.094 | -2.994 | -237% |
Net Assets | 2.79B | 6.08M | 45,992% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 15.00 | 59.00 | 25% |
Yield | 3.30 | 0.00 | - |
Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
GNR | LITP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago83% | 20 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago84% | 14 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LITP | 100% | -2.56% | ||
ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
SGML - LITP | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
SLI - LITP | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.45% | ||
More |