Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GNR vs LITP
GNR vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs LITP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$56.15
Change+$0.23 (+0.41%)
Volume$118.34K
Net Assets3.19B
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.07
Change+$0.21 (+2.67%)
Volume$47.69K
Net Assets20.74M
GNR vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. LITP commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a Buy and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.19B vs. LITP (20.7M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: LITP (20.756) vs GNR (14.359). GNR was incepted earlier than LITP: GNR (15 years) vs LITP (3 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). LITP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 14.359 | 20.756 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 3.19B | 20.7M | 15,415% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.65 | 62% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 3.90 | 6.71 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ECNS | 37.23 | 1.00 | +2.76% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | |||
| EAOM | 29.30 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Mod Allc ETF | |||
| UPSD | 25.59 | -0.03 | -0.11% |
| Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | |||
| BJUL | 48.43 | -0.17 | -0.35% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF July | |||
| USXF | 56.05 | -0.25 | -0.44% |
| iShares® ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | |||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +2.63% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 75% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +13.27% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| SLI - LITP | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
More | ||||