Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GNR vs LITP
GNR vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs LITP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$58.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
Volume$103
Net Assets3.28B
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.95
Change-$0.38 (-4.56%)
Volume$1.8K
Net Assets21.16M
GNR vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. LITP commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a Buy and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.28B vs. LITP (21.2M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: LITP (24.701) vs GNR (18.385). GNR was incepted earlier than LITP: GNR (15 years) vs LITP (3 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). LITP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 18.385 | 24.701 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 21.2M | 15,486% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.65 | 62% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 3.66 | 5.41 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| SHEL - GNR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| RIO - GNR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| SLB - GNR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CNQ - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| VALE - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 49% Loosely correlated | -6.52% | ||
More | ||||