GNR | ICOP | GNR / ICOP | |
Gain YTD | 19.731 | 50.796 | 39% |
Net Assets | 3.37B | 106M | 3,181% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.47 | 85% |
Turnover | 15.00 | 37.00 | 41% |
Yield | 3.59 | 1.92 | 187% |
Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
GNR | ICOP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago82% | 3 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago81% | 9 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ICOP | 100% | -3.15% | ||
BHP - ICOP | 80% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
RIO - ICOP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
NEM - ICOP | 51% Loosely correlated | -7.63% | ||
AAL - ICOP | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
TKO - ICOP | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.77% |