GNNDY
Price
$49.10
Change
+$1.82 (+3.85%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.89B
HOCPF
Price
$116.00
Change
+$4.33 (+3.88%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
41.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GNNDY vs HOCPF

Header iconGNNDY vs HOCPF Comparison
Open Charts GNNDY vs HOCPFBanner chart's image
GN Store Nord A/S
Price$49.10
Change+$1.82 (+3.85%)
Volume$610
Capitalization3.89B
Hoya
Price$116.00
Change+$4.33 (+3.88%)
Volume$945
Capitalization41.52B
GNNDY vs HOCPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GNNDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GNNDY vs. HOCPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNNDY is a Hold and HOCPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GNNDY: $49.10 vs. HOCPF: $116.00)
Brand notoriety: GNNDY and HOCPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GNNDY: 214% vs. HOCPF: 69%
Market capitalization -- GNNDY: $3.89B vs. HOCPF: $41.52B
GNNDY [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $3.89B. HOCPF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $41.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GNNDY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOCPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GNNDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HOCPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GNNDY and HOCPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GNNDY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOCPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GNNDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HOCPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNNDY is a better buy in the short-term than HOCPF.

Price Growth

GNNDY (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +7.06% price change this week, while HOCPF (@Medical Specialties) price change was -0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.95% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOCPF($41.5B) has a higher market cap than GNNDY($3.89B). HOCPF (35.97) and GNNDY (35.59) have similar P/E ratio . HOCPF YTD gains are higher at: -4.996 vs. GNNDY (-11.881). HOCPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 267B vs. GNNDY (2.6B). HOCPF has more cash in the bank: 426B vs. GNNDY (676M). GNNDY has less debt than HOCPF: GNNDY (16.7B) vs HOCPF (24.6B). HOCPF has higher revenues than GNNDY: HOCPF (734B) vs GNNDY (19B).
GNNDYHOCPFGNNDY / HOCPF
Capitalization3.89B41.5B9%
EBITDA2.6B267B1%
Gain YTD-11.881-4.996238%
P/E Ratio35.5935.9799%
Revenue19B734B3%
Total Cash676M426B0%
Total Debt16.7B24.6B68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GNNDY vs HOCPF: Fundamental Ratings
GNNDY
HOCPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
77100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9882
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GNNDY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as HOCPF (20). This means that GNNDY’s stock grew similarly to HOCPF’s over the last 12 months.

HOCPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GNNDY (100). This means that HOCPF’s stock grew similarly to GNNDY’s over the last 12 months.

GNNDY's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as HOCPF (100). This means that GNNDY’s stock grew similarly to HOCPF’s over the last 12 months.

HOCPF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as GNNDY (54). This means that HOCPF’s stock grew similarly to GNNDY’s over the last 12 months.

HOCPF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as GNNDY (98). This means that HOCPF’s stock grew similarly to GNNDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GNNDYHOCPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GNNDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EOT16.390.03
+0.18%
EATON VANCE NATIONAL Municipal OPPORTUNITIES TRUST
BNGE36.070.04
+0.10%
First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF
EDGI26.090.02
+0.09%
3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF
ICOW34.470.01
+0.03%
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
EBIZ30.61N/A
N/A
Global X E-commerce ETF

GNNDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNNDY and TRUMY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNNDY and TRUMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNNDY
1D Price
Change %
GNNDY100%
N/A
TRUMY - GNNDY
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
SAUHY - GNNDY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
SOAGY - GNNDY
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
ESLOY - GNNDY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
GNGBY - GNNDY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

HOCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOCPF and HOCPY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOCPF and HOCPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOCPF
1D Price
Change %
HOCPF100%
+3.88%
HOCPY - HOCPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
FZMD - HOCPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDTA - HOCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRME - HOCPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNNDY - HOCPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More