GNGYF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.78B
MTRJF
Price
$3.53
Change
+$0.38 (+12.06%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GNGYF vs MTRJF

Header iconGNGYF vs MTRJF Comparison
Open Charts GNGYF vs MTRJFBanner chart's image
Guangshen Railway
Price$0.23
Change+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Volume$31.85K
Capitalization2.78B
MTR
Price$3.53
Change+$0.38 (+12.06%)
Volume$5.25K
Capitalization22.13B
GNGYF vs MTRJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GNGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTRJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GNGYF vs. MTRJF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNGYF is a Hold and MTRJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GNGYF: $0.23 vs. MTRJF: $3.53)
Brand notoriety: GNGYF and MTRJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GNGYF: 174% vs. MTRJF: 186%
Market capitalization -- GNGYF: $2.78B vs. MTRJF: $22.13B
GNGYF [@Railroads] is valued at $2.78B. MTRJF’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $22.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $133.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $16.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GNGYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTRJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GNGYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTRJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GNGYF and MTRJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GNGYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTRJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GNGYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTRJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTRJF is a better buy in the short-term than GNGYF.

Price Growth

GNGYF (@Railroads) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTRJF (@Railroads) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (+2.33% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTRJF($22.1B) has a higher market cap than GNGYF($2.79B). GNGYF has higher P/E ratio than MTRJF: GNGYF (11.67) vs MTRJF (10.91). MTRJF YTD gains are higher at: 6.970 vs. GNGYF (-19.107).
GNGYFMTRJFGNGYF / MTRJF
Capitalization2.79B22.1B13%
EBITDA1.39BN/A-
Gain YTD-19.1076.970-274%
P/E Ratio11.6710.91107%
Revenue27.4BN/A-
Total Cash2.34BN/A-
Total Debt1.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GNGYF vs MTRJF: Fundamental Ratings
GNGYF
MTRJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
8580
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTRJF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as GNGYF (36). This means that MTRJF’s stock grew similarly to GNGYF’s over the last 12 months.

GNGYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRJF (100). This means that GNGYF’s stock grew similarly to MTRJF’s over the last 12 months.

MTRJF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as GNGYF (85). This means that MTRJF’s stock grew similarly to GNGYF’s over the last 12 months.

MTRJF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as GNGYF (62). This means that MTRJF’s stock grew similarly to GNGYF’s over the last 12 months.

GNGYF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRJF (93). This means that GNGYF’s stock grew similarly to MTRJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GNGYFMTRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GNGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTRJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CORZ13.760.07
+0.51%
Core Scientific
ABM47.700.18
+0.38%
ABM Industries
BRLS3.01-0.03
-0.99%
Borealis Foods
YUMC47.85-0.87
-1.79%
Yum China Holdings
PAPL4.02-0.73
-15.37%
Pineapple Financial Inc

GNGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNGYF and MTCPY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNGYF and MTCPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNGYF
1D Price
Change %
GNGYF100%
N/A
MTCPY - GNGYF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRJF - GNGYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBHF - GNGYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGROY - GNGYF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGROF - GNGYF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTRJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTRJF and MTCPY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTRJF and MTCPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTRJF
1D Price
Change %
MTRJF100%
N/A
MTCPY - MTRJF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRPOF - MTRJF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRY - MTRJF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
FGROF - MTRJF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNGYF - MTRJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More