Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMZPX vs RGACX
GMZPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GMZPX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts P
Price$37.46
Change+$0.18 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
GMZPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMZPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMZPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. GMZPX (1.57B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GMZPX: RGACX (0.07) vs GMZPX (0.05). GMZPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GMZPX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than GMZPX (0.58). GMZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GMZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GMZPX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.05 vs. GMZPX (15.30). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. GMZPX (-5.65).
| GMZPX | RGACX | GMZPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.94 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.94 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.404 | 16.155 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.07 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 21.05 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.84 | 51.55 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.65 | 42.51 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement