Advertisement
GMXTF vs PNYG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMXTF is a Hold and PNYG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMXTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNYG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GMXTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PNYG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMXTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNYG’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GMXTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- PNYG’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GMXTF (@Railroads) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PNYG (@Railroads) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.74%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Railroads (+0.20% weekly)The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.
| GMXTF | PNYG | GMXTF / PNYG | |
| Capitalization | 8.37B | 2.1M | 398,049% |
| EBITDA | 27.6B | -165.91K | -16,635,926% |
| Gain YTD | -24.074 | -65.509 | 37% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.71 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 63B | 136K | 46,323,529% |
| Total Cash | 6.33B | 21.7K | 29,170,507% |
| Total Debt | 44.3B | N/A | - |
| GMXTF | PNYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 6 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | 3 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EQAL | 51.85 | 0.49 | +0.96% |
| Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | |||
| HAP | 57.13 | 0.46 | +0.81% |
| VanEck Natural Resources ETF | |||
| SPMO | 120.58 | 0.27 | +0.22% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF | |||
| GMUB | 50.75 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF | |||
| IMAR | 28.89 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Mar | |||
GMXTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMXTF and ZHUZY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMXTF and ZHUZY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMXTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMXTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZHUZY - GMXTF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXPGF - GMXTF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WJRYY - GMXTF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| PNYG - GMXTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SRAIF - GMXTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PNYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNYG has been loosely correlated with NXPGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PNYG jumps, then NXPGF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNYG | 100% | N/A | ||
| NXPGF - PNYG | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GMXTF - PNYG | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SRAIF - PNYG | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ODERF - PNYG | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ZHUZY - PNYG | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||