GMVMF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.02 (-10.53%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
15.34M
GNGXF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.04 (+22.22%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
29.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMVMF vs GNGXF

Header iconGMVMF vs GNGXF Comparison
Open Charts GMVMF vs GNGXFBanner chart's image
GMV Minerals
Price$0.17
Change-$0.02 (-10.53%)
Volume$13.5K
Capitalization15.34M
Inventus Mining
Price$0.22
Change+$0.04 (+22.22%)
Volume$16K
Capitalization29.84M
GMVMF vs GNGXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GMVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNGXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMVMF vs. GNGXF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMVMF is a Hold and GNGXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (GMVMF: $0.17 vs. GNGXF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: GMVMF and GNGXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMVMF: 26% vs. GNGXF: 39%
Market capitalization -- GMVMF: $16.31M vs. GNGXF: $29.79M
GMVMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $16.31M. GNGXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $29.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $75.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMVMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGNGXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GMVMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GNGXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMVMF is a better buy in the long-term than GNGXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMVMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNGXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMVMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GNGXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMVMF is a better buy in the short-term than GNGXF.

Price Growth

GMVMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +18.75% price change this week, while GNGXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +31.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNGXF($29.8M) has a higher market cap than GMVMF($15.3M). GNGXF YTD gains are higher at: 209.902 vs. GMVMF (142.898). GMVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -610.17K vs. GNGXF (-656.64K). GNGXF has more cash in the bank: 282K vs. GMVMF (31.9K). GMVMF (0) and GNGXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GMVMFGNGXFGMVMF / GNGXF
Capitalization15.3M29.8M51%
EBITDA-610.17K-656.64K93%
Gain YTD142.898209.90268%
P/E RatioN/A95.96-
Revenue00-
Total Cash31.9K282K11%
Total DebtN/A11.9K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMVMF vs GNGXF: Fundamental Ratings
GMVMF
GNGXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMVMF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNGXF (100). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNGXF’s over the last 12 months.

GNGXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMVMF (100). This means that GNGXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMVMF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVMF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GNGXF (100). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew similarly to GNGXF’s over the last 12 months.

GNGXF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GMVMF (36). This means that GNGXF’s stock grew similarly to GMVMF’s over the last 12 months.

GNGXF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GMVMF (100). This means that GNGXF’s stock grew similarly to GMVMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMVMFGNGXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GMVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNGXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFKCY15.291.03
+7.22%
Daifuku Co., Ltd.
ITXXF2.20N/A
N/A
Itaconix plc
LDGYY20.52N/A
N/A
Landis Gyr Group AG
VMTHF0.25N/A
N/A
VENUS MEDTECH HANGZHOU INC.
EBBGF24.45-0.14
-0.57%
Enbridge Inc.

GMVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMVMF and MAIFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMVMF and MAIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMVMF
1D Price
Change %
GMVMF100%
-12.26%
MAIFF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
NESRF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
IEGCF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
DTARF - GMVMF
13%
Poorly correlated
+8.77%
GLNS - GMVMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GNGXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNGXF and GLBKF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNGXF and GLBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNGXF
1D Price
Change %
GNGXF100%
+23.44%
GLBKF - GNGXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVMF - GNGXF
0%
Poorly correlated
-12.26%
GLNS - GNGXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTARF - GNGXF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+8.77%