GMVHY
Price
$12.07
Change
+$0.28 (+2.37%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.69B
KMBIF
Price
$14.89
Change
+$0.56 (+3.91%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
351.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMVHY vs KMBIF

Header iconGMVHY vs KMBIF Comparison
Open Charts GMVHY vs KMBIFBanner chart's image
ENTAIN
Price$12.07
Change+$0.28 (+2.37%)
Volume$14.57K
Capitalization7.69B
Kambi Group
Price$14.89
Change+$0.56 (+3.91%)
Volume$716
Capitalization351.96M
GMVHY vs KMBIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GMVHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMVHY vs. KMBIF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMVHY is a Hold and KMBIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GMVHY: $12.07 vs. KMBIF: $14.89)
Brand notoriety: GMVHY and KMBIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMVHY: 233% vs. KMBIF: 281%
Market capitalization -- GMVHY: $7.69B vs. KMBIF: $351.96M
GMVHY [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $7.69B. KMBIF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $351.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $49.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMVHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMBIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GMVHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GMVHY and KMBIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMVHY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMBIF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMVHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KMBIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMVHY is a better buy in the short-term than KMBIF.

Price Growth

GMVHY (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +3.78% price change this week, while KMBIF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +3.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.51% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMVHY($7.69B) has a higher market cap than KMBIF($352M). KMBIF YTD gains are higher at: 55.428 vs. GMVHY (46.517). GMVHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 416M vs. KMBIF (52.1M). GMVHY has more cash in the bank: 447M vs. KMBIF (53.1M). KMBIF has less debt than GMVHY: KMBIF (8M) vs GMVHY (3.76B). GMVHY has higher revenues than KMBIF: GMVHY (5.17B) vs KMBIF (169M).
GMVHYKMBIFGMVHY / KMBIF
Capitalization7.69B352M2,184%
EBITDA416M52.1M798%
Gain YTD46.51755.42884%
P/E RatioN/A43.57-
Revenue5.17B169M3,056%
Total Cash447M53.1M842%
Total Debt3.76B8M46,956%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMBIF: Fundamental Ratings
KMBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMVHYKMBIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GMVHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDVD21.720.31
+1.45%
FT Vest SMID Ris Div Ach Trg IncETF
INRO31.500.20
+0.65%
iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Act ETF
SPHY23.920.04
+0.17%
SPDR® Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
LFAW176.27N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF
RWM16.82-0.14
-0.83%
ProShares Short Russell2000

GMVHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMVHY and VAC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMVHY and VAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMVHY
1D Price
Change %
GMVHY100%
+2.37%
VAC - GMVHY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
BRSL - GMVHY
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
WYNN - GMVHY
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
GDEN - GMVHY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
BYD - GMVHY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
More

KMBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMBIF and PYTCF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMBIF and PYTCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMBIF
1D Price
Change %
KMBIF100%
N/A
PYTCF - KMBIF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRKZF - KMBIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFDJF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - KMBIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - KMBIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More