GMVHF
Price
$12.80
Change
+$0.71 (+5.87%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.38B
GRKZF
Price
$21.96
Change
-$0.20 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMVHF vs GRKZF

Header iconGMVHF vs GRKZF Comparison
Open Charts GMVHF vs GRKZFBanner chart's image
ENTAIN
Price$12.80
Change+$0.71 (+5.87%)
Volume$4.49K
Capitalization11.38B
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
Price$21.96
Change-$0.20 (-0.90%)
Volume$347
Capitalization6.5B
GMVHF vs GRKZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GMVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMVHF vs. GRKZF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMVHF is a Hold and GRKZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GMVHF: $12.80 vs. GRKZF: $21.96)
Brand notoriety: GMVHF and GRKZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMVHF: 22% vs. GRKZF: 114%
Market capitalization -- GMVHF: $11.38B vs. GRKZF: $6.5B
GMVHF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $11.38B. GRKZF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $6.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMVHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRKZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GMVHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRKZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRKZF is a better buy in the long-term than GMVHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMVHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRKZF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMVHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GRKZF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMVHF is a better buy in the short-term than GRKZF.

Price Growth

GMVHF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +3.39% price change this week, while GRKZF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.05% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMVHF($11.4B) has a higher market cap than GRKZF($6.5B). GMVHF has higher P/E ratio than GRKZF: GMVHF (222.22) vs GRKZF (16.56). GMVHF YTD gains are higher at: 49.010 vs. GRKZF (34.230). GRKZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 686M vs. GMVHF (547M). GMVHF (606M) and GRKZF (600M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . GRKZF has less debt than GMVHF: GRKZF (889M) vs GMVHF (3.4B). GMVHF has higher revenues than GRKZF: GMVHF (4.3B) vs GRKZF (1.3B).
GMVHFGRKZFGMVHF / GRKZF
Capitalization11.4B6.5B175%
EBITDA547M686M80%
Gain YTD49.01034.230143%
P/E Ratio222.2216.561,342%
Revenue4.3B1.3B330%
Total Cash606M600M101%
Total Debt3.4B889M382%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMVHF vs GRKZF: Fundamental Ratings
GMVHF
GRKZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8810
SMR RATING
1..100
9817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
259
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMVHF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GRKZF (88). This means that GMVHF’s stock grew similarly to GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

GRKZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMVHF (88). This means that GRKZF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

GRKZF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMVHF (98). This means that GRKZF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GRKZF (48). This means that GMVHF’s stock grew similarly to GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRKZF (59). This means that GMVHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRKZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMVHFGRKZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GMVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SG14.690.29
+2.01%
Sweetgreen
LFMDP24.050.35
+1.50%
LifeMD
RGLD179.820.97
+0.54%
Royal Gold
UCL1.83N/A
N/A
uCloudlink Group
SKBL12.40-0.16
-1.27%
Skyline Builders Group Holding Ltd

GMVHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMVHF and EVVTY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMVHF and EVVTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMVHF
1D Price
Change %
GMVHF100%
+5.87%
EVVTY - GMVHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
GMVHY - GMVHF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
GEBHF - GMVHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIGNF - GMVHF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EIHDF - GMVHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRKZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRKZF and GMVHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRKZF and GMVHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRKZF
1D Price
Change %
GRKZF100%
N/A
GMVHF - GRKZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
MCHVY - GRKZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - GRKZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHY - GRKZF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
KMBIF - GRKZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More