Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMSMX vs NAESX
GMSMX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GMSMX vs NAESX
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$21.13
Change+$0.20 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.04M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.10
Change+$1.17 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
GMSMX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMSMX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMSMX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. GMSMX (97M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: NAESX (1.20) vs GMSMX (0.39). GMSMX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GMSMX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GMSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.87 vs. NAESX (13.00). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GMSMX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. GMSMX (1.32). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.48 vs. GMSMX (48.47).
| GMSMX | NAESX | GMSMX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.182 | 6.199 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.20 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.32 | 8.00 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 50.66 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.47 | 71.48 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.84 | 148.14 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement