GMS vs SPXC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMS is a Hold and SPXC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SPXC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPXC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SPXC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GMS (@Building Products) experienced а +1.58% price change this week, while SPXC (@Building Products) price change was +3.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +3.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
SPXC is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+3.64% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| GMS | SPXC | GMS / SPXC | |
| Capitalization | 3.88B | 5.56B | 70% |
| EBITDA | 593M | 277M | 214% |
| Gain YTD | -2.876 | 2.165 | -133% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.67 | 39.26 | 35% |
| Revenue | 5.39B | 1.74B | 310% |
| Total Cash | 88.3M | 99.4M | 89% |
| Total Debt | 1.23B | 558M | 220% |
GMS | SPXC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GMS's Valuation (61) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as SPXC (85) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to SPXC’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as SPXC (11) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to SPXC’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's SMR Rating (56) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as SPXC (59) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to SPXC’s over the last 12 months.
SPXC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as GMS (61) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that SPXC’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPXC (88) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPXC’s over the last 12 months.
| GMS | SPXC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | 11 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 45% |
GMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMS | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| BLDR - GMS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| ROCK - GMS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| AZEK - GMS | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| TREX - GMS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| OC - GMS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||
SPXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPXC has been loosely correlated with GMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPXC jumps, then GMS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPXC | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| GMS - SPXC | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| AZEK - SPXC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| LMB - SPXC | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ROCK - SPXC | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| BLDR - SPXC | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||