GMS
Price
$109.86
Change
-$0.10 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.88B
38 days until earnings call
OC
Price
$138.39
Change
-$1.65 (-1.18%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.51B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMS vs OC

Header iconGMS vs OC Comparison
Open Charts GMS vs OCBanner chart's image
GMS
Price$109.86
Change-$0.10 (-0.09%)
Volume$3.9K
Capitalization3.88B
Owens Corning
Price$138.39
Change-$1.65 (-1.18%)
Volume$700
Capitalization14.51B
GMS vs OC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMS vs. OC commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMS is a Hold and OC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (GMS: $109.96 vs. OC: $140.04)
Brand notoriety: GMS: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMS: 1% vs. OC: 90%
Market capitalization -- GMS: $3.88B vs. OC: $14.51B
GMS [@Building Products] is valued at $3.88B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $14.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the long-term than GMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GMS and OC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GMS (@Building Products) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was -5.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

GMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

OC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-0.80% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OC($14.5B) has a higher market cap than GMS($3.88B). GMS has higher P/E ratio than OC: GMS (13.67) vs OC (12.85). GMS YTD gains are higher at: 29.624 vs. OC (-17.052). OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.28B vs. GMS (593M). OC has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. GMS (88.3M). GMS has less debt than OC: GMS (1.23B) vs OC (3.27B). OC has higher revenues than GMS: OC (9.68B) vs GMS (5.39B).
GMSOCGMS / OC
Capitalization3.88B14.5B27%
EBITDA593M2.28B26%
Gain YTD29.624-17.052-174%
P/E Ratio13.6712.85106%
Revenue5.39B9.68B56%
Total Cash88.3M1.62B5%
Total Debt1.23B3.27B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMS vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
GMS
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1439
SMR RATING
1..100
7683
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
518
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as GMS (67) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as OC (39) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's SMR Rating (76) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as OC (83) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as OC (61) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as OC (18) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMSOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEE15.630.08
+0.51%
Central and Eastern Europe Fund (The)
RDVI24.810.03
+0.12%
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF
VEMY27.17N/A
N/A
Virtus Stone Harbor Emr Mkt Hi Yld BdETF
XIJN30.92N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Bffr & Prm Inc ETF -June
EFAX46.70-0.13
-0.28%
SPDR® MSCI EAFE Fssl Ful Free RsrvETF

GMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMS
1D Price
Change %
GMS100%
N/A
BLDR - GMS
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
AWI - GMS
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBIN - GMS
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
OC - GMS
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
MAS - GMS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
-1.16%
FBIN - OC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
BLDR - OC
72%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
MAS - OC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
WMS - OC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
CSL - OC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
More