GMS
Price
$109.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.2B
91 days until earnings call
OC
Price
$148.01
Change
-$1.45 (-0.97%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.38B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMS vs OC

Header iconGMS vs OC Comparison
Open Charts GMS vs OCBanner chart's image
GMS
Price$109.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Volume$713.43K
Capitalization4.2B
Owens Corning
Price$148.01
Change-$1.45 (-0.97%)
Volume$861.19K
Capitalization12.38B
GMS vs OC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMS vs. OC commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMS is a Buy and OC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GMS: $109.96 vs. OC: $148.01)
Brand notoriety: GMS: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMS: 46% vs. OC: 103%
Market capitalization -- GMS: $4.2B vs. OC: $12.38B
GMS [@Building Products] is valued at $4.2B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $12.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $90.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the long-term than GMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the short-term than GMS.

Price Growth

GMS (@Building Products) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was -3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

GMS is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

OC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-1.30% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OC($12.4B) has a higher market cap than GMS($4.2B). GMS has higher P/E ratio than OC: GMS (41.81) vs OC (18.12). GMS YTD gains are higher at: 29.624 vs. OC (-11.897). OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.96B vs. GMS (428M). OC has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. GMS (55.6M). GMS has less debt than OC: GMS (1.6B) vs OC (5.98B). OC has higher revenues than GMS: OC (11.7B) vs GMS (5.51B).
GMSOCGMS / OC
Capitalization4.2B12.4B34%
EBITDA428M1.96B22%
Gain YTD29.624-11.897-249%
P/E Ratio41.8118.12231%
Revenue5.51B11.7B47%
Total Cash55.6M230M24%
Total Debt1.6B5.98B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMS vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
GMS
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1959
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1742
SMR RATING
1..100
7782
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4248

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (41) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as GMS (72) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as OC (42) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's SMR Rating (77) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as OC (82) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as OC (51) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as OC (21) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMSOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDE29.710.18
+0.61%
Matthews India Active ETF
PDO13.960.06
+0.43%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
SDSI51.470.06
+0.12%
American Century® Short Dur Str Inc ETF
BAPR46.260.03
+0.06%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Apr
ARMG9.75-0.10
-1.02%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Arm Daily ETF

GMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMS
1D Price
Change %
GMS100%
-0.01%
BLDR - GMS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
OC - GMS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
FBIN - GMS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
WMS - GMS
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
AWI - GMS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
-0.97%
FBIN - OC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
TREX - OC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
MAS - OC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
BLDR - OC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
LPX - OC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More