It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GMS (@Building Products) experienced а -6.31% price change this week, while LMB (@Building Products) price change was -3.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.20%.
GMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
LMB is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
GMS | LMB | GMS / LMB | |
Capitalization | 3.88B | 454M | 854% |
EBITDA | 593M | 38.4M | 1,544% |
Gain YTD | 7.983 | 99.274 | 8% |
P/E Ratio | 13.67 | 23.57 | 58% |
Revenue | 5.39B | 516M | 1,045% |
Total Cash | 88.3M | 59.8M | 148% |
Total Debt | 1.23B | 42M | 2,917% |
GMS | LMB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GMS's Valuation (63) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LMB (91) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.
LMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as GMS (8) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's SMR Rating (43) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LMB (50) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.
LMB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as GMS (58) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
LMB's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as GMS (22) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS | LMB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 3 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 3 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 3 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 3 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 3 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GMS | 100% | -2.06% | ||
BLDR - GMS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
ROCK - GMS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
AZEK - GMS | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
TREX - GMS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
JELD - GMS | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMB has been loosely correlated with SPXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMB jumps, then SPXC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LMB | 100% | -2.75% | ||
SPXC - LMB | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
GMS - LMB | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
ROCK - LMB | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
FBIN - LMB | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
OC - LMB | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
More |